Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity

被引:303
作者
Bolognini, Nadia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro [1 ,3 ]
Fregni, Felipe [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Berenson Allen Ctr Noninvas Brain Stimulat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Guttmann Neurorehabil, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; LONG-TERM DEPRESSION; MECHANISMS UNDERLYING RECOVERY; CORTICAL SPREADING DEPRESSION; INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; CHRONIC STROKE; HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY; UNAFFECTED HEMISPHERE; DC-STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1186/1743-0003-6-8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Therapies for motor recovery after stroke or traumatic brain injury are still not satisfactory. To date the best approach seems to be the intensive physical therapy. However the results are limited and functional gains are often minimal. The goal of motor training is to minimize functional disability and optimize functional motor recovery. This is thought to be achieved by modulation of plastic changes in the brain. Therefore, adjunct interventions that can augment the response of the motor system to the behavioural training might be useful to enhance the therapy-induced recovery in neurological populations. In this context, noninvasive brain stimulation appears to be an interesting option as an add-on intervention to standard physical therapies. Two non-invasive methods of inducing electrical currents into the brain have proved to be promising for inducing long-lasting plastic changes in motor systems: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). These techniques represent powerful methods for priming cortical excitability for a subsequent motor task, demand, or stimulation. Thus, their mutual use can optimize the plastic changes induced by motor practice, leading to more remarkable and outlasting clinical gains in rehabilitation. In this review we discuss how these techniques can enhance the effects of a behavioural intervention and the clinical evidence to date.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: Enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats [J].
Adkins-Muir, DL ;
Jones, TA .
NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 25 (08) :780-788
[2]   Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans [J].
Antal, A ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Kincses, TZ ;
Kruse, W ;
Hoffmann, KP ;
Paulus, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 19 (10) :2888-2892
[3]   Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain [J].
Ardolino, G ;
Bossi, B ;
Barbieri, S ;
Priori, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (02) :653-663
[4]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[5]  
Boggio PS, 2007, RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS, V25, P123
[6]   Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis [J].
Bolton, DAE ;
Cauraugh, JH ;
Hausenblas, HA .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 223 (02) :121-127
[7]  
Brown JA, 2006, NEUROSURGERY, V58, P464, DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197100.63931.04
[8]   Can the 'yin and yang' BDNF hypothesis be used to predict the effects of rTMS treatment in neuropsychiatry? [J].
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky ;
Boggio, Paulo Sergio ;
Fregni, Felipe .
MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2008, 71 (02) :279-282
[9]   Functions of the mirror neuron system: Implications for neurorehabilitation [J].
Buccino, Giovanni ;
Solodkin, Ana ;
Small, Steven L. .
COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY, 2006, 19 (01) :55-63
[10]  
Bury SD, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P8597