Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning

被引:1487
作者
Berkes, Fikret [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Nat Resources Inst, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
Co-management; Knowledge; Bridging organizations; Social learning; Institutions; Governance; Trust; Adaptive co-management; JOINT FOREST MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; FISHERIES COMANAGEMENT; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; RESILIENCE; SCALES; SOCIETY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over a period of some 20 years, different aspects of co-management (the sharing of power and responsibility between the government and local resource users) have come to the forefront. The paper focuses on a selection of these: knowledge generation, bridging organizations, social learning, and the emergence of adaptive co-management. Co-management can be considered a knowledge partnership. Different levels of organization, from local to international, have comparative advantages in the generation and mobilization of knowledge acquired at different scales. Bridging organizations provide a forum for the interaction of these different kinds of knowledge, and the coordination of other tasks that enable co-operation: accessing resources, bringing together different actors, building trust, resolving conflict, and networking. Social learning is one of these tasks, essential both for the co-operation of partners and an outcome of the co-operation of partners. It occurs most efficiently through joint problem solving and reflection within learning networks. Through successive rounds of learning and problem solving, learning networks can incorporate new knowledge to deal with problems at increasingly larger scales, with the result that maturing co-management arrangements become adaptive co-management in time. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1692 / 1702
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Acheson JamesM., 2003, CAPTURING COMMONS
[2]   Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework [J].
Agarwal, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1623-1648
[4]  
[Anonymous], EC HUM WELL BEING GE
[5]  
Armitage D., 2007, Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance
[6]   Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning [J].
Armitage, Derek ;
Marschke, Melissa ;
Plummer, Ryan .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (01) :86-98
[7]   Building social capital through participatory research: An analysis of collaboration on Tohono O'odham tribal rangelands in Arizona [J].
Arnold, Jennifer S. ;
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2007, 20 (06) :481-495
[8]  
Ayles B.G., 2007, Adaptive Co-Management. Collaboration, Learning, P125
[9]   Co-management from the top? The roles of policy entrepreneurs and distributive conflict in developing co-management arrangements [J].
Beem, Betsi .
MARINE POLICY, 2007, 31 (04) :540-549
[10]  
Bene C., 2004, Aquatic Resources, Culture and Development, V1, P35, DOI 10.1079/cabireviews20063050507