On Hodgson on property rights

被引:16
作者
Allen, Douglas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Econ, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1744137415000132
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Geoffrey Hodgson has a number of criticisms regarding the 'economic approach to property rights' that has been mostly championed by members of the UCLA and Washington departments of economics during the 1960s-1990s. In this short note I address these comments and point out that most are simply a matter of nomenclature. When there are disagreements they stem from Hodgson's failure to account for positive transaction costs and this literature's emphasis on operational explanations of organization.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 717
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Allen D.W., 1997, COASEAN EC LAW EC NE, P105
[2]  
Allen Doug., 1991, RES. L. ECON, V14, P1, DOI [10.1086/467217, DOI 10.1086/467217]
[3]   The Coase theorem: coherent, logical, and not disproved [J].
Allen, Douglas W. .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 11 (02) :379-390
[4]  
Allen Douglas W., 2000, The Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, V1
[5]  
[Anonymous], THEORY SHARETENANCY
[6]  
Barzel Y., 1997, Economic analysis of property rights (political economy of institutions and decisions)
[7]  
Cheung Steven., 2009, EC SYSTEM CHINA
[8]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[9]   THE COST OF COASE [J].
COOTER, R .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1982, 11 (01) :1-33
[10]   Much of the 'economics of property rights' devalues property and legal rights [J].
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 11 (04) :683-709