Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct

被引:1218
作者
Edmondson, Amy C. [1 ]
Lei, Zhike [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[2] ESMT, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 1 | 2014年 / 1卷
关键词
organizational learning; teams; team learning; LEARNING BEHAVIORS; TEAM PERFORMANCE; EMPLOYEE VOICE; TASK CONFLICT; KNOWLEDGE; IMPROVEMENT; LEADERSHIP; QUALITY; TRUST; WORK;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Psychological safety describes people's perceptions of the consequences of taking interpersonal risks in a particular context such as a workplace. First explored by pioneering organizational scholars in the 1960s, psychological safety experienced a renaissance starting in the 1990s and continuing to the present. Organizational research has identified psychological safety as a critical factor in understanding phenomena such as voice, teamwork, team learning, and organizational learning. A growing body of conceptual and empirical work has focused on understanding the nature of psychological safety, identifying factors that contribute to it, and examining its implications for individuals, teams, and organizations. In this article, we review and integrate this literature and suggest directions for future research. We first briefly review the early history of psychological safety research and then examine contemporary research at the individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis. We assess what has been learned and discuss suggestions for future theoretical development and methodological approaches for organizational behavior research on this important interpersonal construct.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 43
页数:21
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1965, PERSONAL ORG CHANGE
[2]   Out on a climb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues [J].
Ashford, SJ ;
Rothbard, NP ;
Piderit, SK ;
Dutton, JE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1998, 43 (01) :23-57
[3]   Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance [J].
Baer, M ;
Frese, M .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 (01) :45-68
[4]   Reaping the Benefits of Task Conflict in Teams: The Critical Role of Team Psychological Safety Climate [J].
Bradley, Bret H. ;
Postlethwaite, Bennett E. ;
Klotz, Anthony C. ;
Hamdani, Maria R. ;
Brown, Kenneth G. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (01) :151-158
[5]   The Structural Context of Team Learning: Effects of Organizational and Team Structure on Internal and External Learning [J].
Bresman, Henrik ;
Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (04) :1120-1139
[6]   Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners [J].
Bunderson, J. Stuart ;
Boumgarden, Peter .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (03) :609-624
[7]   Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model [J].
Burke, C. Shawn ;
Stagl, Kevin C. ;
Salas, Eduardo ;
Pierce, Linda ;
Kendall, Dana .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1189-1207
[8]   Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice [J].
Burris, Ethan R. ;
Detert, James R. ;
Chiaburu, Dan S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (04) :912-922
[9]   Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation effectiveness and efficiency [J].
Butler, JK .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 1999, 24 (02) :217-238
[10]   Social capital, psychological safety and learning behaviours from failure in organisations [J].
Carmeli, Abraham .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2007, 40 (01) :30-44