Arterial spin labeling: Benefits and pitfalls of high magnetic field

被引:70
作者
Golay, Xavier
Petersen, Esben T.
机构
[1] Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Lab Mol Imaging, Singapore 138667, Singapore
[2] Natl Inst Neurosci, Dept Neuroradiol, Singapore 308433, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques are MR imaging methods designed to measure the endogenous perfusion signal coming from arterial blood by manipulation of its magnetization. These methods are based on the subtraction of two consecutively acquired images: one acquired after preparation of the arterial blood magnetization upstream to the area of interest, and the second without any manipulation of its arterial magnetization. The subtraction of both images provides information on the perfusion of the tissue present in the slice of interest. Because ASL is a very low SNR technique, the shift from 1.5 T to 3.0 T should be regarded as a great way to increase signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Furthermore, the concomitant increase in blood T, should improve the SNR of ASL further. Other effects related to poorer magnetic filed homogeneities and reduced T-2 relaxation times, however, will counterbalance both effects partially. In this article, the pros and cons of the use of ASL at high field are summarized, after a brief description of the major techniques used and their theoretical limitations. Finally, a summary of the few existing dedicated ASL perfusion techniques available are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling [J].
Alsop, DC ;
Detre, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (02) :410-416
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 13 ANN INT SOC MAG
[3]  
[Anonymous], P SOC MAGN RESON MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW
[5]   Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) [J].
Bammer, R ;
Keeling, SL ;
Augustin, M ;
Pruessmann, KP ;
Wolf, R ;
Stollberger, R ;
Hartung, HP ;
Fazekas, F .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (03) :548-554
[6]   Methodology of brain perfusion imaging [J].
Barbier, EL ;
Lamalle, L ;
Décorps, M .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (04) :496-520
[7]  
Crelier GR, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P132, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199901)41:1<132::AID-MRM18>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-5
[9]   Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel Imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 Tesla [J].
de Zwart, JA ;
Ledden, PJ ;
van Gelderen, P ;
Bodurka, J ;
Chu, RX ;
Duyn, JH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (01) :22-26
[10]   TISSUE-SPECIFIC PERFUSION IMAGING USING ARTERIAL SPIN-LABELING [J].
DETRE, JA ;
ZHANG, WG ;
ROBERTS, DA ;
SILVA, AC ;
WILLIAMS, DS ;
GRANDIS, DJ ;
KORETSKY, AP ;
LEIGH, JS .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 1994, 7 (1-2) :75-82