Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: Power, sample size and robustness

被引:256
作者
Freidlin, B
Zheng, G
Li, ZH
Gastwirth, JL
机构
[1] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, Rockville, MD USA
[2] NCI, Biostat Branch, Rockville, MD USA
[3] NHLBI, Off Biostat Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Rockville, MD USA
[5] George Washington Univ, Dept Stat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
candidate gene associations; Cochran-Armitage trend test; MAX test; maximin efficiency robust test; power approximation; sample size;
D O I
10.1159/000064976
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Cochran-Armitage trend test is commonly used as a genotype-based test for candidate gene association. Corresponding to each underlying genetic model there is a particular set of scores assigned to the genotypes that maximizes its power. When the variance of the test statistic is known, the formulas for approximate power and associated sample size are readily obtained. In practice, however, the variance of the test statistic needs to be estimated. We present formulas for the required sample size to achieve a prespecified power that account for the need to estimate the variance of the test statistic. When the underlying genetic model is unknown one can incur a substantial loss of power when a test suitable for one mode of inheritance is used where another mode is the true one. Thus, tests having good power properties relative to the optimal tests for each model are useful. These tests are called efficiency robust and we study two of them: the maximin efficiency robust test is a linear combination of the standardized optimal tests that has high efficiency and the MAX test, the maximum of the standardized optimal tests. Simulation results of the robustness of these two tests indicate that the more computationally involved MAX test is preferable. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 152
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[2]  
COHCRAN WG, 1954, BIOMETRICS, V10, P417
[3]  
Freidlin B, 1999, BIOMETRICS, V55, P883
[5]  
Ott J., 1999, ANAL HUMAN GENETIC L
[6]  
Podgor MJ, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P2095, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961015)15:19<2095::AID-SIM349>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-Y
[8]   From genotypes to genes: Doubling the sample size [J].
Sasieni, PD .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (04) :1253-1261
[9]   Association between functional polymorphism in EGF gene and malignant melanoma [J].
Shahbazi, M ;
Pravica, V ;
Nasreen, N ;
Fakhoury, H ;
Fryer, AA ;
Strange, RC ;
Hutchinson, PE ;
Osborne, JE ;
Lear, JT ;
Smith, AG ;
Hutchinson, IV .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9304) :397-401
[10]   Allele-sharing among affected relatives: non-parametric methods for identifying genes [J].
Shih, MC ;
Whittemore, AS .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (01) :27-55