Firm-level productivity studies: Illusions and a solution

被引:86
作者
Katayama, Hajime [2 ]
Lu, Shihua
Tybout, James R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Econ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Productivity measurement; Differentiated products; Panel data; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; PRICES; OUTPUT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Applied economists often wish to measure the effects of policy changes (like trade liberalization) or managerial decisions (like R&D expenditures or exporting) on firm-level productivity patterns. But firm-level data on physical quantities of output, capital, and intermediate inputs are typically unobservable. Therefore, when constructing productivity measures, most analysts proxy these variables with real sales revenues, depreciated capital spending, and real input expenditures. Our first objective is to argue that the resultant productivity indices have little to do with technical efficiency, product quality, or contributions to social welfare. Nonetheless, they are likely to be correlated with policy shocks and managerial decisions in misleading ways. Our second objective is to develop an alternative approach to inference. We assume firms' costs and revenues reflect a Bertrand-Nash equilibrium in a differentiated product industry, as in Berry [Berry, Steven (1994) "Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation," Rand journal 25(2), pp. 242-262.]. This allows us to impute each firm's unobserved marginal costs and product appeal from its observed revenues and costs. With these in hand, we calculate each firm's contribution to consumer and producer surplus. Further, we link these welfare measures to policy and managerial decisions by assuming that marginal costs and product appeal indices follow vector autoregressive (VAR) processes, conditioned on policy proxies and/or managerial choice variables. We estimate the demand system parameters and VAR parameters jointly using Bayesian techniques. Applying our methodology to panel data on Colombian paper producers, we study the relation between our welfare-based measures and conventional productivity measures. We find that the two are only weakly correlated with one another. Further, they give contrasting pictures of the relationship between firms' performances and their participation in foreign markets. One reason is that product appeal variation has little effect on standard productivity indices, but it is captured by welfare-based performance measures. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 413
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ACKERBERG DA, 2002, 8798 NBER
[2]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[3]   The labor market effects of foreign owned firms [J].
Almeida, Rita .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 72 (01) :75-96
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB INT TRADE
[5]   Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing [J].
Aw, BY ;
Chen, XM ;
Roberts, MJ .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2001, 66 (01) :51-86
[6]   DECOMPOSING LEARNING BY DOING IN NEW PLANTS [J].
BAHK, BH ;
GORT, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (04) :561-583
[7]  
Baily M.N., 1992, Microeconomics, V1992, P187
[8]  
Baldwin J.R., 1991, ENTRY MARKET CONTEST, P244
[9]   Plants and productivity in international trade [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Eaton, J ;
Jensen, JB ;
Kortum, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1268-1290
[10]   Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Jensen, JB .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 47 (01) :1-25