Product Choice and Market Competition: The Case of Multiproduct Electronic Plants in Taiwan

被引:10
作者
Aw, Bee Yan [1 ]
Lee, Yi [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
关键词
Multiproduct plants; product strategy; supply complementarities; D21; D24; O12; CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION; FIRM; RELATEDNESS; PERFORMANCE; ENTRY; EXIT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01590.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the strategies of multiproduct plants in the Taiwanese electronics sector by introducing two new measures of product dissimilarity to capture the technological gaps of product pairs within the plant. The plant-level index is used to analyze product mix decisions of plants. We find that plants whose products have large technological gaps are more likely to give up product lines. The product-level index is used to show that, with increased competition, multiproduct plants exit markets where production technologies are farthest away from their core products and they also perform better than plants that continue to produce a wider range of products.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 740
页数:30
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 0901 NZ TREAS
[2]   Firm size and the pattern of diversification [J].
Aw, BY ;
Batra, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1998, 16 (03) :313-331
[3]   Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing [J].
Aw, BY ;
Chen, XM ;
Roberts, MJ .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2001, 66 (01) :51-86
[4]  
BALDWIN J, 2006, EC ANAL RES PAPER SE, V38
[5]  
Becker Sascha O., 2007, 1906 CESIFO
[6]  
BERNARD A, AM EC REV IN PRESS
[7]  
BERNARD A, 2009, MULTIPRODUCT F UNPUB
[8]  
Bowen HP, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V26, P1153, DOI 10.1002/smj.499
[9]   Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia [J].
De Loecker, Jan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 73 (01) :69-98
[10]   PATTERNS OF FIRM ENTRY AND EXIT IN UNITED-STATES MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES [J].
DUNNE, T ;
ROBERTS, MJ ;
SAMUELSON, L .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1988, 19 (04) :495-515