Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design

被引:577
作者
Alonso, Hernan
Bliznyuk, Andrey A.
Gready, Jill E.
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, John Curtin Sch Med Res, Computat Proteom Grp, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, ANU Supercomp Facil, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
docking; molecular dynamics; drug design; binding free energies; protein flexibility; ligand conformations; protein-ligand interactions; ligand-binding site; scoring function; virtual screening; rotamer library; trajectory;
D O I
10.1002/med.20067
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
A rational approach is needed to maximize the chances of finding new drugs, and to exploit the opportunities of potential new drug targets emerging from genomic and proteomic initiatives, and from the large libraries of small compounds now readily available through combinatorial chemistry. Despite a shaky early history, computer-aided drug design techniques can now be effective in reducing costs and speeding up drug discovery. This happy outcome results from development of more accurate and reliable algorithms, use of more thoughtfully planned strategies to apply them, and greatly increased computer power to allow studies with the necessary reliability to be performed. Our review focuses on applications and protocols, with the main emphasis on critical analysis of recent studies where docking calculations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were combined to dock small molecules into protein receptors. We highlight successes to demonstrate what is possible now, but also point out drawbacks and future directions. The review is structured to lead the reader from the simpler to more compute-intensive methods. Thus, while inexpensive and fast docking algorithms can be used to scan large compound libraries and reduce their size, more accurate but expensive MD simulations can be applied when a few selected ligand candidates remain. MD, simulations can be used: during the preparation of the protein receptor before docking, to optimize its structure and account for protein flexibility; for the refinement of docked complexes, to include solvent effects and account for induced fit; to calculate binding free energies, to provide an accurate ranking of the potential ligands; and in the latest developments, during the docking process itself to find the binding site and correctly dock the ligand a priori. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 568
页数:38
相关论文
共 210 条
[1]   Protein structure prediction [J].
Al-Lazikani, B ;
Jung, J ;
Xiang, ZX ;
Honig, B .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (01) :51-56
[2]   Binding affinity prediction with different force fields:: Examination of the linear interaction energy method [J].
Almlöf, M ;
Brandsdal, BO ;
Åqvist, J .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 25 (10) :1242-1254
[3]   Multiple ligand-binding modes in bacterial R67 dihydrofolate reductase [J].
Alonso, H ;
Gillies, MB ;
Cummins, PL ;
Bliznyuk, AA ;
Gready, JE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2005, 19 (03) :165-187
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ACCOUNTS CHEM RES, V29
[5]  
Apostolakis J, 1998, J COMPUT CHEM, V19, P21, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19980115)19:1<21::AID-JCC2>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-0
[7]   Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations [J].
Åqvist, J ;
Luzhkov, VB ;
Brandsdal, BO .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 35 (06) :358-365
[8]  
Åqvist J, 2001, COMB CHEM HIGH T SCR, V4, P613
[9]  
Aqvist J, 1996, J COMPUT CHEM, V17, P1587, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19961115)17:14<1587::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-H