Market experience eliminates some anomalies-and creates new ones

被引:22
作者
Braga, Jacinto [2 ]
Humphrey, Steven J. [1 ]
Starmer, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Econ & Int Dev, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
Preference reversal; Vickrey auction; Refining; Loss experience; Price following; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PREFERENCE REVERSALS; BEHAVIOR; UTILITY; ACCEPT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We report two experiments which investigate whether experience of decision making in repeated markets purges behaviour of preference reversals. We investigate two behavioural mechanisms that may be shaping bids in repeated auctions: A tendency to adjust bids towards previously observed market prices, and a tendency to reduce bids following bad market outcomes. We find little support for the former but strong support for the latter. Also, whilst 'just enough' market exposure eliminates the typical preference reversal phenomenon, continued exposure fosters the mirror image anomaly. Therefore, although market experience shapes behaviour, in our experiments, it does not generally promote consistency with standard preference theory. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 416
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences [J].
Bateman, I ;
Munro, A ;
Rhodes, B ;
Starmer, C ;
Sugden, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :479-505
[2]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[3]   Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL ;
Wakker, PP .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (11) :1498-1514
[4]   Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon [J].
Butler, David J. ;
Loomes, Graham C. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (01) :277-297
[5]  
Camerer C., 1995, HDB EXPT EC, P587
[6]  
CHU YP, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P902
[7]   THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY MEASURES OF VALUE [J].
COURSEY, DL ;
HOVIS, JL ;
SCHULZE, WD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 102 (03) :679-690
[8]   The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives [J].
Cox, JC ;
Grether, DM .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 7 (03) :381-405
[9]   On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System [J].
Robin P. Cubitt ;
Chris Starmer ;
Robert Sugden .
Experimental Economics, 1998, 1 (2) :115-131
[10]   Testing explanations of preference reversal [J].
Cubitt, RP ;
Munro, A ;
Starmer, C .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2004, 114 (497) :709-726