A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services

被引:2788
作者
de Groot, RS
Wilson, MA
Boumans, RMJ
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, ICIS, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Maryland, Ctr Environm Sci, Inst Ecol Econ, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
classification of ecosystem functions; typology of goods and services; ecological and socio-economic valuation;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
An increasing amount of information is being collected on the ecological and socio-economic value of goods and services provided by natural and semi-natural ecosystems. However, much of this information appears scattered throughout a disciplinary academic literature, unpublished government agency reports, and across the World Wide Web. In addition, data on ecosystem goods and services often appears at incompatible scales of analysis and is classified differently by different authors. In order to make comparative ecological economic analysis possible, a standardized framework for the comprehensive assessment of ecosystem functions, goods and services is needed. In response to this challenge, this paper presents a conceptual framework and typology for describing, classifying and valuing ecosystem functions, goods and services in a clear and consistent manner. In the following analysis, a classification is given for the fullest possible range of 23 ecosystem functions that provide a much larger number of goods and services. In the second part of the paper, a checklist and matrix is provided, linking these ecosystem functions to the main ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation methods. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 408
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SUSTAINABLE ENV EC M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, T N WILDL NAT RES C
[3]  
BAILEY IA, 1974, READINGS WILDLIFE CO
[4]   ISSUES IN ECOSYSTEM VALUATION - IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING [J].
BINGHAM, G ;
BISHOP, R ;
BRODY, M ;
BROMLEY, D ;
CLARK, E ;
COOPER, W ;
COSTANZA, R ;
HALE, T ;
HAYDEN, G ;
KELLERT, S ;
NORGAARD, R ;
NORTON, B ;
PAYNE, J ;
RUSSELL, C ;
SUTER, G .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) :73-90
[5]   Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model [J].
Boumans, R ;
Costanza, R ;
Farley, J ;
Wilson, MA ;
Portela, R ;
Rotmans, J ;
Villa, F ;
Grasso, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) :529-560
[6]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[7]  
Daily G.C., 2013, NATURES SERVICES SOC, P454, DOI [10.12987/9780300188479-039/html, DOI 10.12987/9780300188479-039/HTML, 10.12987/9780300188479-039]
[8]   Ecology -: The value of nature and the nature of value [J].
Daily, GC ;
Söderqvist, T ;
Aniyar, S ;
Arrow, K ;
Dasgupta, P ;
Ehrlich, PR ;
Folke, C ;
Jansson, A ;
Jansson, BO ;
Kautsky, N ;
Levin, S ;
Lubchenco, J ;
Mäler, KG ;
Simpson, D ;
Starrett, D ;
Tilman, D ;
Walker, B .
SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5478) :395-396
[9]  
De Groot R. S., 2000, Implementing ecological integrity. Nato science series, V1, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-5876-3_13, 10.1007/978-94-011-5876-3_13]
[10]  
De Groot RudolfS., 1992, FUNCTIONS NATURE EVA