Revenue sharing in semiconductor industry supply chain: Cooperative game theoretic approach

被引:16
作者
Bahinipati, Bikram K. [1 ]
Kanda, Arun [1 ]
Deshmukh, S. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Mech Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
来源
SADHANA-ACADEMY PROCEEDINGS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2009年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词
Supply chain coordination; revenue sharing; Game theory; Shapely value;
D O I
10.1007/s12046-009-0018-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper defines cooperation as the process of coordinating the objectives and activities of supply chain (SC) members. It also focuses on cooperation as a solution for hybrid coordination mechanism to form the basis for semiconductor industry supply chain management. In the complex and competitive environment of semiconductor industry supply chain, independent system members are facing the difficult task of providing/sharing incentives resulting from e-market activities in a fair and equitable manner. So, various other activities are necessary for the e-market to make revenue sharing operations more stable and reliable. In this context, the importance of coalition in enhancing the e-market capability, for revenue generation and sharing, is used to develop a possible mechanism for financial compensation to the supply chain members. Interpreting the supply chain as cooperation, the concepts of the Shapely value are used in this paper for analysing the revenue sharing problem. The motivation behind such a scheme is to align the supply chain members' cost structure with the bidding value during auction and bargaining for e-procurement. The appropriateness of the Shapely value is verified to ensure that a stable solution exists. The practical implication of this paper is how to make right decisions about revenue sharing. The principal contribution of this approach is for establishing a pooling coalition in order to provide a stable and cooperative solution.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 527
页数:27
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SUPPLY CHAIN ANAL EB
[2]  
Aumann R. J., 1974, International Journal of Game Theory, V3, P217, DOI 10.1007/BF01766876
[3]  
Aumann R. J., 1988, ENDOGENOUS FORMATION, P175
[4]  
Axelrod Robert, 1984, THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION
[5]   A noncooperative model of network formation [J].
Bala, V ;
Goyal, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2000, 68 (05) :1181-1229
[6]   Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (01) :30-44
[7]  
CAULIER JF, 2007, CONTRACTUALLY STABLE, P1
[8]  
Chopra S., 2004, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM
[9]   AGENCY THEORY - AN ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :57-74
[10]   An incomplete cooperation structure for a voting game can be strategically stable [J].
Feinberg, Y .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1998, 24 (1-2) :2-9