Dynamic compensation and contingent sourcing strategies for supply disruption

被引:37
作者
Li, Shanshan [1 ,2 ]
He, Yong [2 ]
Minner, Stefan [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Finance, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, Munich, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply disruption; contingent sourcing; compensation; safety inventory; control theory; INVENTORY MODEL; CHAIN; RISK; IMPROVEMENT; MANAGEMENT; DISCOUNTS; DEMAND; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1840643
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Alternative measures to deal with supply disruptions exist. We consider a make-to-order (MTO) supply chain with one manufacturer who sources from a single supplier. When a supply disruption occurs, the manufacturer can choose to satisfy some demand by either maintaining production through safety stocks or through a secondary contingent source, and turn some unmet demand into backorders on the basis of compensation. An optimal control model under consideration of the customers' dynamic reactions to the joint implementation of these strategies is formulated with the objective of minimising the cost of disruption. Through the application of Pontryagin's Maximum Principle, optimal mitigation strategies are established in closed form. They provide analytical guidance on how to dynamically and jointly adapt the quantity of contingent sourcing, the price of compensation, and the speed of safety inventory consumption. The results indicate how cost and time-related factors impact these strategies. We also demonstrate that pure strategies are only effective in tackling short supply shortages. For long disruptions, it is superior to adopt combined strategies that simultaneously incorporate two countermeasures in certain periods.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1533
页数:23
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, FORTUNE
[2]   Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks [J].
Azad, Nader ;
Hassini, Elkafi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 275 (02) :481-501
[3]   Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions [J].
Baryannis, George ;
Validi, Sahar ;
Dani, Samir ;
Antoniou, Grigoris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (07) :2179-2202
[4]   Stockout compensation: Joint inventory and price optimization in electronic retailing [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Sun, DW ;
Xu, SH .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2006, 18 (02) :255-266
[5]  
Breen B., 2011, LIVING DELL TIME
[6]   Did the tobacco industry inflate estimates of illicit cigarette consumption in Asia? An empirical analysis [J].
Chen, Jing ;
McGhee, Sarah M. ;
Townsend, Joy ;
Lam, Tai Hing ;
Hedley, Anthony J. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2015, 24 (E2) :E161-E167
[7]   Random yield and coordination mechanisms of a supply chain with emergency backup sourcing [J].
Chen, Kebing ;
Yang, Lei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (16) :4747-4767
[8]   Dynamic pricing through discounts for optimizing multiple-class demand fulfillment [J].
Ding, Q ;
Kouvelis, P ;
Milner, JM .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 54 (01) :169-183
[9]   Service Failure Recovery and Prevention: Managing Stockouts in Distribution Channels [J].
Dong, Yan ;
Xu, Kefeng ;
Cui, Tony Haitao ;
Yao, Yuliang .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2015, 34 (05) :689-701
[10]   Price discounts for increased profitability under partial backordering [J].
Drake, Matthew J. ;
Pentico, David W. .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 18 (01) :87-101