Interests, institutions, and climate policy: Explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector

被引:90
作者
Hughes, Llewelyn [1 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; MARKET DEVELOPMENT; KYOTO PROTOCOL; POLITICS; GERMANY; STRATEGY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
What explains variation in the energy-related climate policies that nations implement? In this paper we present a theory of energy-related climate policy in democratic countries, emphasizing the distributional effects of policies on important energy-related industries, public sentiment, and the institutional capacity of governments, in determining energy-related climate policies implemented cross-nationally. As to the form of the policy, we expect the government to favor regulatory instruments over fiscal policies (taxes, subsidies) when it has enough institutional capacity in the relevant public agencies. For empirical evidence, we analyze national climate policies in four industrialized democracies: Australia, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   The Global Spread of Environmental Ministries: Domestic-International Interactions [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2014, 58 (04) :764-780
[2]   Political Competition, Path Dependence, and the Strategy of Sustainable Energy Transitions [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (03) :643-658
[3]   Thirteen plus one: a comparison of global climate policy architectures [J].
Aldy, JE ;
Barrett, S ;
Stavins, RN .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2003, 3 (04) :373-397
[4]   DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
ALESINA, A ;
RODRIK, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) :465-490
[5]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTION WORKING
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The institutional dimensions of environmental change
[7]   Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models [J].
Ansolabehere, S ;
Snyder, JM .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2000, 103 (3-4) :327-336
[8]   National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? [J].
Baettig, Michele B. ;
Bernauer, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2009, 63 (02) :281-308
[9]   The United States and international climate cooperation: International "pull" versus domestic "push" [J].
Bang, Guri ;
Froyn, Camilla Bretteville ;
Hovi, Jon ;
Menz, Fredric C. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (02) :1282-1291
[10]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, The theory of environmental policy, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513