Diverse roles for the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases in carcinogenesis

被引:134
作者
Nakamoto, M
Bergemann, AD
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Neurosci NC30, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
ephrin; breast; cancer; oncogene; signaling;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.10177
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their cell-presented ligands, the ephrins, are frequently overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers, including breast, small-cell lung and gastrointestinal cancers, melanomas, and neuroblastomas. In particular, one Eph family member, EphA2, is overexpressed in many cancers, including 40% of breast cancers. EphA2 can also transform breast epithelial cells in vitro to display properties commonly associated with the development of metastasis. Remarkably, the oncogenic properties of EphA2 contravene traditional dogma,with regard to the oncogenic properties of a growth factor and its receptor tyrosine kinase: while stimulation of EphA2 by its ligand (ephrin-A1) results in EphA2 autophosphorylation, the stimulation reverses the oncogenic transformation. As will be discussed in this review, the apparent dependence of oncogenicity on the dephosphorylated state of EphA2 most probably reflects the unique nature of Eph signaling. In particular, oncogenecity may depend on the capacity of unactivated EphA2 to interact with a variety of signaling molecules. As well as acting in oncogenic transformation, a growing body of evidence supports the importance of the concerted actions of ephrins and Eph molecules in tumor angiogenesis. Genetic studies, using targeted mutagenesis in mice, reveal that. ephrin-B1, ephrin-B2, and EphB4 are essential for the normal morphogenesis of the embryonic vasculature into a sophisticated network of arteries, veins, and capillaries. Initial studies indicate that these molecules are also angiogenic in tumors, and as such represent important new targets for the development of chemotherapeutic treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 67
页数:10
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]   The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand ephrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not cranial neural crest migration [J].
Adams, RH ;
Diella, F ;
Hennig, S ;
Helmbacher, F ;
Deutsch, U ;
Klein, R .
CELL, 2001, 104 (01) :57-69
[2]   Roles of ephrinB ligands and EphB receptors in cardiovascular development: demarcation of arterial/venous domains, vascular morphogenesis, and sprouting angiogenesis [J].
Adams, RH ;
Wilkinson, GA ;
Weiss, C ;
Diella, F ;
Gale, NW ;
Deutsch, U ;
Risau, W ;
Klein, R .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 13 (03) :295-306
[3]  
ANDRES AC, 1994, ONCOGENE, V9, P1461
[4]  
ANDRES AC, 1991, ONCOGENE, V6, P771
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Cell, V90, P403
[6]   B61 IS A LIGAND FOR THE ECK RECEPTOR PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASE [J].
BARTLEY, TD ;
HUNT, RW ;
WELCHER, AA ;
BOYLE, WJ ;
PARKER, VP ;
LINDBERG, RA ;
LU, HS ;
COLOMBERO, AM ;
ELLIOTT, RL ;
GUTHRIE, BA ;
HOLST, PL ;
SKRINE, JD ;
TOSO, RJ ;
ZHANG, M ;
FERNANDEZ, E ;
TRAIL, G ;
VARNUM, B ;
YARDEN, Y ;
HUNTER, T ;
FOX, GM .
NATURE, 1994, 368 (6471) :558-560
[7]   SEVERAL RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE GENES OF THE EPH FAMILY ARE SEGMENTALLY EXPRESSED IN THE DEVELOPING HINDBRAIN [J].
BECKER, N ;
SEITANIDOU, T ;
MURPHY, P ;
MATTEI, MG ;
TOPILKO, P ;
NIETO, MA ;
WILKINSON, DG ;
CHARNAY, P ;
GILARDIHEBENSTREIT, P .
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 47 (01) :3-17
[8]   MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF A FAMILY OF LIGANDS FOR EPH-RELATED TYROSINE KINASE RECEPTORS [J].
BECKMANN, MP ;
CERRETTI, DP ;
BAUM, P ;
VANDENBOS, T ;
JAMES, L ;
FARRAH, T ;
KOZLOSKY, C ;
HOLLINGSWORTH, T ;
SHILLING, H ;
MARASKOVSKY, E ;
FLETCHER, FA ;
LHOTAK, V ;
PAWSON, T ;
LYMAN, SD .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1994, 13 (16) :3757-3762
[9]  
BENNETT BD, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P14211
[10]   Expression of the receptor protein tyrosine kinase myk-1/htk in normal and malignant mammary epithelium [J].
Berclaz, G ;
Andres, AC ;
Albrecht, D ;
Dreher, E ;
Ziemiecki, A ;
Gusterson, BA ;
Crompton, MR .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1996, 226 (03) :869-875