The green economy and sustainable development: an uneasy balance?

被引:202
作者
Bina, Olivia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Social Sci, P-1600189 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2013年 / 31卷 / 06期
关键词
green economy; sustainable development; limits; scarcity; paradigm shift; Rio+20; FRAMEWORK; POLITICS; DEGROWTH; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1068/c1310j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (or Rio+20) was conceived at a time of great concern for the health of the world economy. In this atmosphere 'green economy' was chosen as one of two central themes for the conference, building on a burgeoning body of literature on the green economy and growth. This research examines the relationship and influence between the double crisis and the rise of 'greening' as part of the solution. The aim is to understand what defines and distinguishes the proposals contained in twenty-four sources on the green economy (including policy documents by international agencies and think tanks, and research papers), and what is the meaning and implication of the rising greening agenda for sustainable development as it enters the 21st century. Through a systematic qualitative analysis of textual material, three categories of discourse that can illuminate the meaning and implication of greening are identified: 'almost business as usual', 'greening', and 'all change'. An analysis of their relationship with Dryzek's classification of environmental discourse leads to the identification of three interrelated patterns: (1) scarcity and limits, (2) means and ends, and (3) reductionism and unity-which deepen our understanding of the tensions between emerging propositions. The patterns help explain the meaning and implications of greening for sustainable development, revealing an economisation and polarisation of discourses, the persisting weak interpretation of sustainable development, and a tension between the fixing or shifting of dominant socioeconomic paradigms that underpin its conceptualisation.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1047
页数:25
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   A new paradigm for climate change [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Bows, Alice .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (09) :639-640
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GROW UN INC DISTR PO
[3]  
[Anonymous], UN C ENV DEV UN GEN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Report No 1/2013
[5]  
[Anonymous], AFR PROGR REP 2010 A
[6]  
[Anonymous], WORLD EV FOR ANN M 2
[7]  
[Anonymous], P 1 INT C EC DEGR EC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Earth Negotiation Bulletin, V27, P1
[9]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES
[10]  
[Anonymous], WHAT MON CANT BUY MO