The Limitations of Industry Concentration Measures Constructed with Compustat Data: Implications for Finance Research

被引:210
作者
Ali, Ashiq [2 ]
Klasa, Sandy [1 ]
Yeung, Eric [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Finance, Eller Coll Management, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Management, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, JM Tull Sch Accounting, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
G10; G30; L10; PRODUCT-MARKET COMPETITION; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; SEGMENT DISCLOSURES; STOCK RETURNS; CEO TURNOVER; PERFORMANCE; MERGERS; INFORMATION; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1093/rfs/hhn103
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Industry concentration measures calculated with Compustat data, which cover only the public firms in an industry, are poor proxies for actual industry concentration. These measures have correlations of only 13% with the corresponding U.S. Census measures, which are based on all public and private firms in an industry. Also, only when U.S. Census measures are used is there evidence consistent with theoretical predictions that more-concentrated industries, which should be more oligopolistic, are populated by larger and fewer firms with higher price-cost margins. Further, the significant relations of Compustat-based industry concentration measures with the dependent variables of several important prior studies are not obtained when U.S. Census measures are used. One of the reasons for this occurrence is that Compustat-based measures proxy for industry decline. Overall, our results indicate that product markets research that uses Compustat-based industry concentration measures may lead to incorrect conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:3839 / 3871
页数:33
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Executive compensation, strategic competition, and relative performance evaluation: Theory and evidence [J].
Aggarwal, RK ;
Samwick, AA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1999, 54 (06) :1999-2043
[2]   Investment and competition [J].
Akdogu, Evrim ;
MacKay, Peter .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2008, 43 (02) :299-330
[3]   Exposure and markups [J].
Allayannis, G ;
Ihrig, J .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2001, 14 (03) :805-835
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1912, THEORY EC DEV
[5]   Managers' motives to withhold segment disclosures and the effect of SFAS no. 131 on analysts' information environment [J].
Botosan, CA ;
Stanford, M .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2005, 80 (03) :751-771
[6]   Motivations for a change in disclosure frequency and its consequences: An examination of voluntary quarterly segment disclosures [J].
Botosan, CA ;
Harris, MS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (02) :329-353
[7]   Debt financing: Does it boost or hurt firm performance in product markets? [J].
Campello, Murillo .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 82 (01) :135-172
[8]  
Chambers D., 2002, Rev Acc Stud, V7, P133, DOI [10.1023/A:1020217817156, DOI 10.1023/A:1020217817156]
[9]   The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures [J].
Chan, LKC ;
Lakonishok, J ;
Sougiannis, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (06) :2431-2456
[10]   What determines residual income? [J].
Cheng, Q .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2005, 80 (01) :85-112