The timeliness and consequences of disseminating public information by regulators

被引:35
作者
Firth, Michael [1 ]
Rui, Oliver M. [2 ]
Wu, Xi [3 ]
机构
[1] Lingnan Univ, Dept Finance & Insurance, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Accountancy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Sanction and enforcement information; Regulation of disclosure; Market reaction; AUDITING ENFORCEMENT RELEASES; EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS; DISCLOSURES; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.01.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper documents different timeliness in disseminating sanction and enforcement information (SEI) by two types of regulatory agencies in China and the different consequences that flow from them. The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) does not make timely public disclosures of SEI and, instead, leaves it up to the firms to make a public announcement under their general obligation to disclose price-sensitive information. The firms therefore have considerable discretion in deciding whether and when to disclose SEI. In contrast, the stock exchanges in Shenzhen and Shanghai make SEI public promptly through the media and the exchanges' official websites. Using Chinese SEI data during the period 1999-2005, we find that the CSRC approach is associated with significantly lagged corporate disclosure (compared with the timely stock exchange approach) and a significantly negative (but delayed) stock price reaction. We also show that the sanctioned firm may take advantage of the less timely CSRC approach to delay its disclosure of SEI for opportunistic reasons such as completing material transactions. We conclude that the CSRC should make immediate public announcements of SEI as these contain price-sensitive information. Furthermore, the immediate dissemination of SEI will bring the CSRC into line with the disclosure practices of China's stock exchanges and international market regulators. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 132
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Law, finance, and economic growth in China [J].
Allen, F ;
Qian, J ;
Qian, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :57-116
[2]   AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF AUDIT DELAY [J].
ASHTON, RH ;
WILLINGHAM, JJ ;
ELLIOTT, RK .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1987, 25 (02) :275-292
[3]  
Begley J., 1998, Review of Accounting Studies, V3, P347, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009635117801
[4]   Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China [J].
Chen, Gongmeng ;
Firth, Michael ;
Gao, Daniel N. ;
Rui, Oliver M. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 12 (03) :424-448
[5]  
Chen Gongmeng., 2005, J ACCOUNTING PUBLIC, V24, P451, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2005.10.002
[6]   Delays in reporting price-sensitive information: The case of going concern [J].
Citron, David B. ;
Tafller, Richard J. ;
Uang, Jinn-Yang .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 27 (01) :19-37
[7]   DISCUSSION OF THE FINANCIAL AND MARKET EFFECTS OF THE SEC ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT RELEASES [J].
DEFOND, ML ;
SMITH, DB .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 :143-148
[8]  
FAN G, 2003, CHINA PROVINCIAL MAR
[9]   THE FINANCIAL AND MARKET EFFECTS OF THE SECS ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT RELEASES [J].
FEROZ, EH ;
PARK, K ;
PASTENA, VS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 :107-142