A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents

被引:121
作者
Chen, WS [1 ]
Matula, TJ [1 ]
Brayman, AA [1 ]
Crum, LA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Appl Phys Lab, Ctr Ind & Med Ultrasound, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1529667
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Contrast bubble destruction is important in several new diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The pressure threshold of destruction is determined by the shell material, while the propensity for of the bubbles to undergo inertial cavitation (IC) depends both on the gas and shell properties of the ultrasound contrast agent (UCA). The ultrasonic fragmentation thresholds of three specific UCAs (Optison, Sonazoid, and biSpheres), each with different shell and gas properties, were determined under various acoustic conditions. The acoustic emissions generated by the agents, or their derivatives, characteristic of IC after fragmentation, was also compared, using cumulated broadband-noise emissions (IC "dose"). Albumin-shelled Optison and surfactant-shelled Sonazoid had low fragmentation thresholds (mean=0.13 and 0.15 MPa at 1.1 MHz, 0.48 and 0.58 MPa at 3.5 MHz, respectively), while polymer-shelled biSpheres had a significant higher threshold (mean=0.19 and 0.23 MPa at 1.1 MHz, 0.73 and 0.96 MPa for thin- and thick-shell biSpheres at 3.5 MHz, respectively, p<0.01). At comparable initial concentrations, surfactant-shelled Sonazoid produced a much larger IC dose after shell destruction than did either biSpheres or Optison (p<0.01). Thick-shelled biSpheres had the highest fragmentation threshold and produced the lowest IC dose. More than two and five acoustic cycles, respectively, were necessary for the thin- and thick-shell biSpheres to reach a steady-state fragmentation threshold. (C) 2003 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 651
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   GAUGING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CAVITATION FROM SHORT-PULSE, LOW-DUTY CYCLE DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND [J].
APFEL, RE ;
HOLLAND, CK .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (02) :179-185
[2]   Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages [J].
Basude, R ;
Wheatley, MA .
ULTRASONICS, 2001, 39 (06) :437-444
[3]   Stimulated acoustic emission in liver parenchyma with Levovist [J].
Blomley, M ;
Albrecht, T ;
Cosgrove, D ;
Jayaram, V ;
Butler-Barnes, J ;
Eckersley, R .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9102) :568-568
[4]   Improved imaging of liver metastases with stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of enhancement with the US contrast agent SH U 508A: Early experience [J].
Blomley, MJK ;
Albrecht, T ;
Cosgrove, DO ;
Patel, N ;
Jayaram, V ;
Butler-Barnes, J ;
Eckersley, RJ ;
Bauer, A ;
Schlief, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (02) :409-416
[5]   Thresholds for inertial cavitation in Albunex suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions [J].
Chang, PP ;
Chen, WS ;
Mourad, PD ;
Poliachik, SL ;
Crum, LA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2001, 48 (01) :161-170
[6]   Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction [J].
Chomas, JE ;
Dayton, P ;
Allen, J ;
Morgan, K ;
Ferrara, KW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2001, 48 (01) :232-248
[7]   ACOUSTIC CAVITATION NOISE SPECTRA [J].
CRAMER, E ;
LAUTERBORN, W .
APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1982, 38 :209-214
[8]   Cavitational mechanisms in ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis at 1 MHz [J].
Everbach, EC ;
Francis, CW .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 26 (07) :1153-1160
[9]   Correlation of ultrasound-induced hemolysis with cavitation detector output in vitro [J].
Everbach, EC ;
Makin, IRS ;
Azadniv, M ;
Meltzer, RS .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 23 (04) :619-624
[10]   Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents [J].
Forsberg, F ;
Shi, WT ;
Goldberg, BB .
ULTRASONICS, 2000, 38 (1-8) :93-98