Environmental taxes and industry monopolization

被引:19
作者
Schoonbeek, Lambert [2 ]
de Vries, Frans P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Dept Econ, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Econ & Econometr, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Taxes; Market structure; Environmental pollution; Monopoly; ENDOGENOUS MARKET-STRUCTURE; POLLUTING OLIGOPOLISTS; TAXATION; POLICY; DISECONOMIES; STANDARDS; ABATEMENT; MONOPOLY;
D O I
10.1007/s11149-009-9093-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers a market with an incumbent monopolistic firm and a potential entrant. Production by both firms causes polluting emissions. The government selects a tax per unit of emission to maximize social welfare. The size of the tax rate affects whether or not the potential entrant enters the market. We identify the conditions that create a market structure where the preferences of the government and the incumbent firm coincide. Interestingly, there are cases where both the government and incumbent firm prefer a monopoly. Hence, the government might induce profitable monopolization by using a socially optimal tax policy instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 106
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Cournot and Bertrand equilibria compared: substitutability, complementarity and concavity [J].
Amir, R ;
Jin, JY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2001, 19 (3-4) :303-317
[2]  
BARNETT AH, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P1037
[3]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[4]  
BUCHANAN JM, 1975, AM ECON REV, V65, P139
[5]  
BUCHANAN JM, 1969, AM ECON REV, V59, P174
[6]  
Carraro C., 1996, ENV POLICY MARKET ST
[7]   THE EFFECT OF EMISSION TAXES AND ABATEMENT SUBSIDIES ON MARKET-STRUCTURE [J].
CONRAD, K ;
WANG, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1993, 11 (04) :499-518
[8]   INSTRUMENT CHOICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY [J].
DEWEES, DN .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1983, 21 (01) :53-71
[9]  
Ellis HS, 1943, AM ECON REV, V33, P493
[10]   The effects of emissions standards on industry [J].
Farzin, YH .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2003, 24 (03) :315-327