Dynamics of industry architecture and firms' knowledge and capability development: an empirical study of industry transformation

被引:5
作者
Kashan, Alireza Javanmardi [1 ]
Mohannak, Kavoos [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, QUT Business Sch, Sch Management, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Industry architecture; capability development; case study; auto industry; PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE; INNOVATION; POWER; MODULARITY; NETWORKS; CREATION; GROWTH; COSTS;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2016.1227064
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
There is a lack of empirical evidence supporting existing conceptualisations and particularly clarifying the underlying mechanisms involved in the role of dominant firms in industry transformation. This research undertook an in-depth single case study of how a firm managed its knowledge and capability development processes to shape the industry architecture to its benefit. We investigated how a dominant firm manipulates the interdependencies with local suppliers and positions itself at higher levels of the industry architecture hierarchy. Findings suggest that such processes take place over the course of several product innovation projects and across different levels of the product architecture. Such findings contribute to helping firms to manage their knowledge and capability development processes and transform the industry architecture to their advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 700
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Adner R., 2012, WIDE LENS NEW STRATE
[2]   What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? [J].
Ambrosini, Veronique ;
Bowman, Cliff .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2009, 11 (01) :29-49
[3]   Innovation, Modularity, and Vertical Deintegration: Evidence from the Early US Auto Industry [J].
Argyres, Nicholas ;
Bigelow, Lyda .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (04) :842-853
[4]   Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory [J].
Argyres, NS ;
Liebeskind, JP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (01) :49-63
[5]   Innovation, growth and survival [J].
Audretsch, DB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1995, 13 (04) :441-457
[6]  
Baldwin C. Y., 2015, 15028 HARV BUS SCH F
[7]  
Baldwin C.Y., 2000, Design rules: The power of modularity, V1
[8]   Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony [J].
Benner, Mary J. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (01) :42-62
[9]  
Berg B.L., 2014, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, V8th ed.
[10]   Value-based business strategy [J].
Brandenburger, AM ;
Stuart, H .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 1996, 5 (01) :5-24