Cooperative goals and team agreeableness composition for constructive controversy in China

被引:36
作者
Wang, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yi-feng Nancy [3 ]
Tjosvold, Dean [3 ]
Shi, Kan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Lingnan Univ, Dept Management, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Constructive controversy; Cooperative goals; Team agreeableness composition; DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY; WORK GROUP DIVERSITY; RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY; ORGANIZATIONAL GROUPS; SALES PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; SURFACE-LEVEL; CONFLICT; PERSONALITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-009-9175-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Studies have shown that constructive controversy, which is the open-minded discussion of diverse views, contributes to team effectiveness. However, there are few studies on the conditions that facilitate constructive controversy. This study explores the antecedents of constructive controversy from both team interdependence (cooperative goals) and team personality composition perspectives. Sixty customer service teams from a call center of a large mobile communication service provider in China participated in the study. Results further document that cooperative goals predict to constructive controversy. Agreeableness diversity was also found to be an antecedent of constructive controversy, and this effect was moderated by team agreeableness level: The higher the team average agreeableness, the stronger the positive association between agreeableness diversity and constructive controversy. Results were interpreted as suggesting that both cooperative goals and team agreeableness composition can develop constructive controversy in work teams in China and possibly in other cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 153
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Aiken LS., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]   Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams [J].
Alper, S ;
Tjosvold, D ;
Law, KS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 74 (01) :33-52
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[5]   To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams [J].
Barsade, SG ;
Ward, AJ ;
Turner, JDF ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (04) :802-836
[6]   THE NEED TO BELONG - DESIRE FOR INTERPERSONAL ATTACHMENTS AS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN-MOTIVATION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
LEARY, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (03) :497-529
[7]   Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Bell, Suzanne T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (03) :595-615
[8]   CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS - EFFECTS OF SOCIAL IDENTITY, GROUP-SIZE, AND DECISION FRAMING [J].
BREWER, MB ;
KRAMER, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (03) :543-549
[9]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[10]  
Bryne D., 1971, The attraction paradigm