Edge restenosis after implantation of high activity 32P radioactive β-emitting stents

被引:138
作者
Albiero, R [1 ]
Nishida, T [1 ]
Adamian, M [1 ]
Amato, A [1 ]
Vaghetti, M [1 ]
Corvaja, N [1 ]
Di Mario, C [1 ]
Colombo, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Emodinam Ctr Cuore Columbus, I-20145 Milan, Italy
关键词
radioisotopes; stents; restenosis; coronary disease;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.101.21.2454
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-A high restenosis rate has been reported at the edges ("edge restenosis") of P-32 radioactive stents with an initial activity level of 3 to 12 mu Ci. This edge effect might be due to balloon injury and to a low dose of radiation at the stent margins. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the implantation of P-32 radioactive stents with a higher activity level (12 to 21 mu Ci) combined with a nonaggressive stent implantation strategy could solve the problem of edge restenosis. Methods and Results-We compared the results of lesions treated with single radioactive BX stents with an activity of 12 to 21 mu Ci (group 2, n=54 lesions) with the results of lesions treated by single radioactive BX stents with an initial activity level of 3 to 12 mu Ci (group 1, n=42 lesions). There were no procedural events. At the 6-month follow-up, no myocardial infarctions, deaths, or stent thromboses had occurred. Intrastent binary restenosis was 0% in group 1 versus 4% in group 2 (n=2, both at the ostium of the right coronary artery, P=NS). Intrastent neointimal hyperplasia was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. The intralesion (intrastent plus peri-stent) restenosis rate was 38% in group 1 versus 30% in group 2 (P=NS), Conclusions-Single P-32 radioactive stents with an initial activity level of 12 to 21 mu Ci reduced intrastent neointimal hyperplasia compared with stents of 3 to 12 mu Ci, but they did not solve the problem of edge restenosis, even if a nonaggressive stent implantation strategy was used.
引用
收藏
页码:2454 / 2457
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions [J].
Albiero, R ;
Rau, T ;
Schluter, M ;
DiMario, C ;
Reimers, B ;
Mathey, DG ;
Tobis, JM ;
Schofer, J ;
Colombo, A .
CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (09) :2997-3005
[2]   Short- and intermediate-term results of 32P radioactive β-emitting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease -: The Milan dose-response study [J].
Albiero, R ;
Adamian, M ;
Kobayashi, N ;
Amato, A ;
Vaghetti, M ;
Di Mario, C ;
Colombo, A .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (01) :18-26
[3]   INTRACORONARY STENTING WITHOUT ANTICOAGULATION ACCOMPLISHED WITH INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE [J].
COLOMBO, A ;
HALL, P ;
NAKAMURA, S ;
ALMAGOR, Y ;
MAIELLO, L ;
MARTINI, G ;
GAGLIONE, A ;
GOLDBERG, SL ;
TOBIS, JM .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (06) :1676-1688
[4]   Radiation dose from a phosphorous-32 impregnated wire mesh vascular stent [J].
Janicki, C ;
Duggan, DM ;
Coffey, CW ;
Fischell, DR ;
Fischell, TA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (03) :437-445
[5]   Intravascular brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 60 [J].
Nath, R ;
Amols, H ;
Coffey, C ;
Duggan, D ;
Jani, S ;
Li, ZF ;
Schell, M ;
Soares, C ;
Whiting, J ;
Cole, PE ;
Crocker, I ;
Schwartz, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) :119-152
[6]   Long-term adverse effects of radiation inhibition of restenosis: Radiation injury to the aorta and branch arteries in a canine model [J].
Powers, BE ;
Thames, HD ;
Gillette, EL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03) :753-759
[7]  
Reimers B, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V40, P343, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199704)40:4<343::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-9