Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact Correcting Correlation Coefficients Attenuated From Using Coarse Scales

被引:78
作者
Aguinis, Herman [1 ]
Pierce, Charles A. [2 ]
Culpepper, Steven A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Sch Business, Denver, CO 80217 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Fogelman Coll Business & Econ, Dept Management, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Metropolitan State Coll Denver, Denver, CO USA
关键词
scale coarseness; Likert-type scale; correlation coefficient; meta-analysis; artifact; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; FACTUAL WRITTEN INFORMATION; INDIRECT RANGE RESTRICTION; RESPONSE CATEGORIES; VALIDITY GENERALIZATION; MODERATED REGRESSION; RELATIVE INFLUENCE; SAMPLING VARIANCE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; JOB-SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1177/1094428108318065
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Scale coarseness is a pervasive yet ignored methodological artifact that attenuates observed correlation coefficients in relation to population coefficients. The authors describe how to disattenuate correlations that are biased by scale coarseness in primary-level as well as meta-analytic studies and derive the sampling error variance for the corrected correlation. Results of two Monte Carlo simulations reveal that the correction procedure is accurate and show the extent to which coarseness biases the correlation coefficient under various conditions (i.e., value of the population correlation, number of item scale points, and number of scale items). The authors also offer a Web-based computer program that disattenuates correlations at the primary-study level and computes the sampling error variance as well as confidence intervals for the corrected correlation. Using this program, which implements the correction in primary- level studies, and incorporating the suggested correction in meta-analytic reviews will lead to more accurate estimates of construct-level correlation coefficients.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 652
页数:30
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review [J].
Aguinis, H ;
Beaty, JC ;
Boik, RJ ;
Pierce, CA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (01) :94-107
[2]   Improving the estimation of moderating effects by using computer-administered questionnaires [J].
Aguinis, H ;
Bommer, WH ;
Pierce, CA .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 56 (06) :1043-1047
[3]   Estimation of sampling variance of correlations in meta-analysis [J].
Aguinis, H .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (03) :569-590
[4]   Testing moderator variable hypotheses meta-analytically [J].
Aguinis, H ;
Pierce, CA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1998, 24 (05) :577-592
[5]  
Aguinis H, 1997, J APPL PSYCHOL, V82, P528
[6]  
Aguinis H., 2001, Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, P27
[7]  
Aguinis H., 2009, PERFORMANCE MANAGEME, V2nd
[8]  
Aguinis H., STAT METHOD IN PRESS
[9]   Comparison of three meta-analytic procedures for estimating moderating effects of categorical variables [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Sturman, Michael C. ;
Pierce, Charles A. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (01) :9-34
[10]   Understanding the impact of test validity and bias on selection errors and adverse impact in human resource selection [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Smith, Marlene A. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) :165-199