Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory

被引:481
作者
Ahrens, Thomas [1 ]
Chapman, Christopher S.
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Accounting Grp, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Said Business Sch, Oxford OX1 1HP, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper we argue that theory, method, methodology, and knowledge gains in qualitative field studies are intertwined through the ongoing hypothesis development in the field. We develop our argument through a discussion of specific qualitative field studies in management accounting. We emphasise in particular the distinctive role of theory in qualitative research as relating to expression of a subjective reality more than clarification of an objective one. In considering this subjectivity we discuss the ways in which the doing of qualitative research brings to bear discipline on the researcher allowing us to assess the trustworthiness of their accounts. The intention is to develop a more appropriate basis for judging the plausibility of qualitative field studies than notions borrowed from positivistic methodology. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 841
页数:23
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain [J].
Ahrens, T ;
Chapman, CS .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (02) :271-301
[2]   Styles of accountability [J].
Ahrens, T .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1996, 21 (2-3) :139-173
[4]  
Ahrens T., 1998, J MANAG ACCOUNT RES, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.124433
[5]  
Ahrens T., 2000, European Accounting Journal, V9, P477
[7]  
ANDERSON SW, 2006, HDB MANAGEMENT ACCOU
[8]  
[Anonymous], MANAGEMENT WORKER
[9]  
[Anonymous], NATIVES POINT VIEW N
[10]  
[Anonymous], MANAGERIAL LAUREATES