Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives

被引:112
作者
Zabel, Astrid [1 ]
Roe, Brian [2 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Environm Policy & Econ IED, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm & Dev Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Optimal incentive contracts; Payments for environmental services; Performance incentives; Distortion; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; TRADE-OFF; PAYMENTS; RISK; INDICATORS; CONTRACTS; PROGRAMS; STOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Payments for environmental services (PES) schemes have become an increasingly accepted and popular mode for governmental and non-govern mental agencies to use in addressing local and regional declines in ecosystem services. In PES schemes, payments can either be tied to indicators of actions for service provision or to indicators of the generated service itself Performance payments are synonymous for this second group, i.e. payments are completely contingent on the procurement of an environmental good or service. Such a focus raises several practical issues during implementation. We review and translate key aspects of the economic theory of incentives into the context of performance payment schemes with special attention paid to two practical issues: risks outside the individual's control and distortion in the measurement of environmental services. Four different incentive payment approaches are presented and the effects of risk and distortion on optimal incentives are discussed. The investigation of each payment approach is accompanied by a discussion of examples from the field. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 134
页数:9
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN RA, 1980, AM ZOOL, V20, P575
[2]  
Albers H. J., 2006, Economic development and environmental sustainability: new policy options, P382
[3]   Performance standards and optimal incentives [J].
Arnalz, Oscar Gutierrez ;
Salas-Fumas, Vicente .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2008, 45 (01) :139-152
[4]   NONCONTROLLABLE COSTS AND RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING [J].
BAIMAN, S ;
NOEL, J .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1985, 23 (02) :486-501
[5]   Distortion and risk in optimal incentive contracts [J].
Baker, G .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2002, 37 (04) :728-751
[6]  
Baumol W.J., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[7]  
Bolton P., 2005, Contract Theory
[8]   ACCOUNTING INCOME, STOCK-PRICE, AND MANAGERIAL COMPENSATION [J].
BUSHMAN, RM ;
INDJEJIKIAN, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1993, 16 (1-3) :3-23
[9]  
Casey F, 2007, ASSESSMENT PERFORMAN
[10]  
CLAASSEN R, 2001, AGRIENVIRONMENTAL PO