Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?

被引:1261
作者
Alesina, A [1 ]
Dollar, D
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] CEPR, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
foreign aid; economic development; political economy; democracy;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009874203400
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the pattern of allocation of foreign aid from various donors to receiving countries. We find considerable evidence that the direction of foreign aid is dictated as much by political and strategic considerations, as by the economic needs and policy performance of the recipients. Colonial past and political alliances are major determinants of foreign aid. At the margin, however, countries that democratize receive more aid, ceteris paribus. While foreign aid flows respond to political variables, foreign direct investments are more sensitive to economic incentives, particularly "good policies" and protection of property rights in the receiving countries. We also uncover significant differences in the behavior of different donors.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 63
页数:31
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ASS AID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, FREEDOM WORLD POLITI
[3]   Political, economic, and humanitarian motivations for PL 480 food aid: Evidence from Africa [J].
Ball, R ;
Johnson, C .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1996, 44 (03) :515-537
[4]  
Barro RobertJ., 1996, Journal of Economic Growth, V1, P1, DOI [10.1007/BF00163340, DOI 10.1007/BF00163340]
[5]   Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid [J].
Boone, P .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 40 (02) :289-329
[6]  
BURNSIDE C, IN PRESS AM EC REV
[7]  
*CENTR INT AG, 1996, WORLD FACTB
[8]  
Collier Paul, 1998, 2041 WORLD BANK
[9]   COMPETING MODELS OF INTERNATIONAL LENDING ACTIVITY [J].
FREY, BS ;
SCHNEIDER, F .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1986, 20 (02) :225-245
[10]   THE COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF FREEDOM - EXPERIENCES AND SUGGESTIONS [J].
GASTIL, RD .
STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 25 (01) :25-50