The angiogenesis inhibitor, endostatin, does not affect murine cutaneous wound healing

被引:105
作者
Berger, AC
Feldman, AL
Gnant, MFX
Kruger, EA
Sim, BKL
Hewitt, S
Figg, WD
Alexander, HR
Libutti, SK
机构
[1] NCI, Surg Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Med Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Pathol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] EntreMed Inc, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
angiogenesis; endostatin; tensile strength; endothelial cells;
D O I
10.1006/jsre.2000.5890
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Endostatin is a potent angiogenesis inhibitor, which is currently being used in Phase I trials as an antitumor agent. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endostatin has an effect on wound healing in a murine model. Materials and methods. The function of endostatin was confirmed using a human microvascular endothelial cell (HMVEC) proliferation assay in which cells are treated for 4 days with growth media plus or minus endostatin, Full-thickness incisions were made on the dorsum of athymic nude mice and closed primarily with skin staples. PVA sponges were implanted in some wounds to determine vascular ingrowth. Subsequently, mice were treated with recombinant human endostatin at 20 mg/kg/day or 50 mg/kg/dose BID versus control for a total of 14 days. On Days 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16, three mice per group had serum samples drawn and were sacrificed. Perpendicular breaking strength (N) was determined using an Instron 5540 tensometer. Wound strength was determined by dividing breaking strength by wound area (N/cm(2)). Vascular density in sponges was determined using CD31 immunohistochemistry. Serum endostatin concentrations were determined using a commercially available ELISA kit. Results. Endostatin caused a significant reduction of endothelial cell proliferation after 4 days compared to media alone (72%, P = 0.031). At all time points tested, there was no statistical difference in the wound-breaking strength between endostatin and control-treated mice at either the low or high dose. Serum endostatin levels were consistently 10-fold higher in endostatin-treated mice than in controls. No differences in vascular density were seen in endostatin versus control-treated mice as determined by CD31 immunohistochemistry of PVA sponges. Conclusion. Therapy with human endostatin does not induce a significant decrease in breaking strength of cutaneous wounds in mice.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Angiogenesis and the skin: A primer [J].
Arbiser, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 34 (03) :486-497
[2]  
Boehm T, 1999, YEAST, V15, P563, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199905)15:7<563::AID-YEA398>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-R
[4]   Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance [J].
Boehm, T ;
Folkman, J ;
Browder, T ;
OReilly, MS .
NATURE, 1997, 390 (6658) :404-407
[5]   THE COMBINATION OF ANTIANGIOGENIC AGENTS TO INHIBIT PRIMARY TUMOR-GROWTH AND METASTASIS [J].
BREM, H ;
GRESSER, I ;
GROSFELD, J ;
FOLKMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1993, 28 (10) :1253-1257
[6]   Endostatin binds to blood vessels in situ independent of heparan sulfate and does not compete for fibroblast growth factor-2 binding [J].
Chang, Z ;
Choon, A ;
Friedl, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 155 (01) :71-76
[7]   Cloning, expression, and in vitro activity of human endostatin [J].
Dhanabal, M ;
Volk, R ;
Ramchandran, R ;
Simons, M ;
Sukhatme, VP .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 258 (02) :345-352
[8]   Endostatin induces endothelial cell apoptosis [J].
Dhanabal, M ;
Ramchandran, R ;
Waterman, MJF ;
Lu, H ;
Knebelmann, B ;
Segal, M ;
Sukhatme, VP .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 274 (17) :11721-11726
[9]   Crystal structure of the angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin at 1.5 Å resolution [J].
Hohenester, E ;
Sasaki, T ;
Olsen, BR ;
Timpl, R .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1998, 17 (06) :1656-1664
[10]   Angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 inhibits murine cutaneous wound healing [J].
Klein, SA ;
Bond, SJ ;
Gupta, SC ;
Yacoub, OA ;
Anderson, GL .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 82 (02) :268-274