Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes

被引:769
作者
Hidrue, Michael K. [2 ]
Parsons, George R. [1 ,2 ]
Kempton, Willett [3 ]
Gardner, Meryl P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Sch Marine Sci & Policy, Delaware, OH 43015 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Econ, Delaware, OH USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Coll Earth Ocean & Environm, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Delaware, OH USA
[4] Univ Delaware, Dept Business Adm, Delaware, OH 43015 USA
关键词
Electric vehicles; Stated preference; Discrete choice; CLEAN-FUEL VEHICLES; CHOICE; DEMAND; PREFERENCES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article presents a stated preference study of electric vehicle choice using data from a national survey. We used a choice experiment wherein 3029 respondents were asked to choose between their preferred gasoline vehicle and two electric versions of that preferred vehicle. We estimated a latent class random utility model and used the results to estimate the willingness to pay for five electric vehicle attributes: driving range, charging time, fuel cost saving, pollution reduction, and performance. Driving range, fuel cost savings, and charging time led in importance to respondents. Individuals were willing to pay (wtp) from $35 to $75 for a mile of added driving range, with incremental wtp per mile decreasing at higher distances. They were willing to pay from $425 to $3250 per hour reduction in charging time (for a 50mile charge). Respondents capitalized about 5 years of fuel saving into the purchase price of an electric vehicle. We simulated our model over a range of electric vehicle configurations and found that people with the highest values for electric vehicles were willing to pay a premium above their wtp for a gasoline vehicle that ranged from $6000 to $16,000 for electric vehicles with the most desirable attributes. At the same time, our results suggest that battery cost must drop significantly before electric vehicles will find a mass market without subsidy. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 705
页数:20
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Anderson CurtisD., 2005, Electric and Hybrid Cars: A History
[2]   ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL DEMAND FOR ELECTRIC CARS [J].
BEGGS, S ;
CARDELL, S ;
HAUSMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1981, 17 (01) :1-19
[3]   Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (04) :421-446
[4]  
Brownstone D, 1999, J ECONOMETRICS, V89, P109
[5]   Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles [J].
Brownstone, D ;
Bunch, DS ;
Train, K .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2000, 34 (05) :315-338
[6]  
Brownstone D., 1996, Res. Transp. Econ., V4, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(96)80007-2, 10.1016/S0739-8859(96)80007-2]
[7]   DEMAND FOR CLEAN-FUEL VEHICLES IN CALIFORNIA - A DISCRETE-CHOICE STATED PREFERENCE PILOT PROJECT [J].
BUNCH, DS ;
BRADLEY, M ;
GOLOB, TF ;
KITAMURA, R ;
OCCHIUZZO, GP .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1993, 27 (03) :237-253
[9]   Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles [J].
Dagsvik, JK ;
Wennemo, T ;
Wetterwald, DG ;
Aaberge, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2002, 36 (04) :361-384
[10]  
EPA, 2010, INT JOINT TECHN ASS