Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database

被引:45
作者
Markpin, T. [1 ]
Boonradsamee, B. [2 ,4 ]
Ruksinsut, K. [4 ]
Yochai, W. [2 ]
Premkamolnetr, N. [3 ]
Ratchatahirun, P. [1 ]
Sombatsompop, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] KMUTT, Sch Energy Environm & Mat, Polymer Proc & Flow Grp, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[2] KMUTT, KMUTT Lib, Thai Journal Citat Index, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[3] KMUTT, Policy Innovat Ctr, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[4] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Pattani, Thailand
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11192-007-1860-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This article proposed a new index, so-called "Article-Count Impact Factor" (ACIF) for evaluating journal quality in light of citation behaviour in comparison with the ISI journal impact factors. The ACIF index was the ratio of the number of articles that were cited in the current year to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. In this work, we used 171 journal titles in materials categories published in the years of 2001-2004 in international journals indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database as data source. It was found that ACIF index could be used as an alternative tool in assessing the journal quality, particularly in the case where the assessed journals had the same (equal or similar) JIF values. The experimental results suggested that the higher the ACIF value, the more the number of articles being cited. The changes in ACIF values were more dependent on the JIF values rather than the total number of articles. Polymer Science had the greatest ACIF values, suggesting that the articles in Polymer Science had greater "citation per article" than those in Metallurgical Engineering and Ceramics. It was also suggested that in order to increase a JIF value of 1.000, Ceramics category required more articles to be cited as compared to Metallurgical Engineering and Polymer Science categories.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 261
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The counting house [J].
Adam, D .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6873) :726-729
[2]   Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country [J].
Bordons, M ;
Fernández, MT ;
Gómez, I .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) :195-206
[3]   Challenging the tyranny of impact factors [J].
Colquhoun, D .
NATURE, 2003, 423 (6939) :479-479
[4]   Analysis of the most highly cited articles from the 50-year history of CCA [J].
Csako, Gyorgy .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 375 (1-2) :43-48
[5]   The history and meaning of the journal impact factor [J].
Garfield, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (01) :90-93
[6]   Impact factors, and why they won't go away [J].
Garfield, E .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6837) :522-522
[7]   Journal impact measures in bibliometric research [J].
Glanzel, W ;
Moed, HF .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) :171-193
[8]   Sprucing up one's impact factor [J].
Gowrishankar, J ;
Divakar, P .
NATURE, 1999, 401 (6751) :321-322
[9]   Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals [J].
Pudovkin, AI ;
Garfield, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 53 (13) :1113-1119
[10]  
Seglen PO, 1997, BRIT MED J, V314, P498