Emission taxes versus other environmental policies

被引:24
作者
Hoel, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9442.00091
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the environmental policy of most countries, various forms of quotas and direct regulation are more important than environmental taxes. This paper addresses four arguments which are often given against the use of emission taxes. The three arguments related to information asymmetries and non-convexities are valid in the sense that they point to complications in the use of environmental taxes. The fourth argument is related to the employment effects of different types of environmental policies in economies with unemployment. Although this argument is frequently used by politicians, the analysis provides no justification for it. On the contrary: in the model used, employment is higher with environmental taxes than with nonrevenue-raising environmental policies.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 104
页数:26
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J COMP EC
[2]   USE OF STANDARDS AND PRICES FOR PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT [J].
BAUMOL, WJ ;
OATES, WE .
SWEDISH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1971, 73 (01) :42-51
[3]  
BOHM P, 1971, EC ENV PAPERS 4 NATI
[4]  
Bohm P., 1997, ECOTAXATION
[5]  
BOHM P, 1985, HDB NATURAL RESOURCE
[6]   ON IMPERFECT INFORMATION AND OPTIMAL POLLUTION-CONTROL [J].
DASGUPTA, P ;
HAMMOND, P ;
MASKIN, E .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (05) :857-860
[7]  
Goulder L., 1995, INT TAX PUBLIC FINAN, V2, P157, DOI [10.1007/BF00877495, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495]
[8]  
GOULDER LH, 1996, 5641 NBER WP
[10]  
Kneese Allen V., 1975, Pollution, Prices, and Public Policy