Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain

被引:42
作者
Arque-Castells, Pere [1 ,2 ]
Cartaxo, Rui M. [3 ]
Garcia-Quevedo, Jose [2 ,4 ]
Godinho, Manuel Mira [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Searle Ctr Law Regulat & Econ Growth, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Barcelona Inst Econ IEB, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Univ Lisbon, ISEG Lisbon Sch Econ & Management, Res Unit Complex & Econ, UECE, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Barcelona, Dept Publ Econ, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Patents; IPR; University; Knowledge transference; OF-THE-LITERATURE; INCENTIVES; COMMERCIALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SCIENTISTS; PATENT; EUROPE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Portuguese and Spanish universities have adopted well-defined royalty sharing arrangements over the last fifteen years. We investigate whether such royalty sharing arrangements have been effective in stimulating inventors' efforts and in ultimately improving university outcomes. We base our empirical analysis on university-level data and two new self-collected surveys for both inventors and Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs). Evidence from the inventors' survey indicates that one third of respondents are incentivised by current royalty sharing arrangements, one third could be incentivised by higher royalty shares, and the remaining third is totally insensitive to royalty sharing. Plain regressions on university level datasets suggest that the incentive effects documented by the inventors' survey fail to translate into increased patenting or licensing income. It would seem that inventor royalty shares are not as influential as they could be, due to the poor commercial prospects of university inventions. Among other possible reasons, these poor prospects appear to reflect the fact that inventors are unable to produce potentially licensable inventions, or that eventually ITOs may not be focussing enough on commercialising their inventions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1858 / 1872
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Do public research organisations own most patents invented by their staff? [J].
Azagra-Caro, Joaquin M. .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 38 (03) :237-250
[2]   University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature [J].
Baldini, Nicola .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2006, 15 (03) :197-207
[3]   To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting [J].
Baldini, Nicola ;
Grimaldi, Rosa ;
Sobrero, Maurizio .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 70 (02) :333-354
[4]   Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy [J].
Baldini, Nicola .
TECHNOVATION, 2010, 30 (02) :109-116
[5]   University Knowledge Transfer: Private Ownership, Incentives, and Local Development Objectives [J].
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Schankerman, Mark .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2009, 52 (01) :111-144
[6]  
Bercovitz J., 2006, J Technol Transf, V31, P175, DOI [10.1007/s10961-005-5029, 10.1007/S10961-005-5029-z, DOI 10.1007/S10961-005-5029-Z]
[7]   Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis [J].
Caldera, Aida ;
Debande, Olivier .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (09) :1160-1173
[8]  
Cartaxo R., 2016, I NATURE AVAIL UNPUB
[9]  
Etzkowitz H., 2002, MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science
[10]   Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands [J].
Freitas, Isabel Maria Bodas ;
Nuvolari, Alessandro .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2012, 19 (08) :671-695