The relationship between object files and conscious perception

被引:60
作者
Mitroff, SR [1 ]
Scholl, BJ [1 ]
Wynn, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
conscious perception; object files; visual processing;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Object files (OFs) are hypothesized mid-level representations which mediate our conscious perception of persisting objects-e.g. telling us `which went where'. Despite the appeal of the OF framework, not previous research has directly explored whether OFs do indeed correspond to conscious percepts. Here we present at least one case wherein conscious percepts of `which went where' in dynamic ambiguous displays diverge from the analogous correspondence computed by the OF system. Observers viewed a `bouncing/streaming' display in which two identical objects moved such that they could have either bounced off or streamed past each other. We measured two dependent variables: (1) an explicit report of perceived bouncing or streaming; and (2) an implicit `object-specific preview benefit' (OSPB), wherein a `preview' of information on a specific object speeds the recognition of that information at a later point when it appears again on the same object (compared to when it reappears on a different object), beyond display-wide priming. When the displays were manipulated such that observers had a strong bias to perceive streaming (on over 95% of the trials), there was nevertheless a strong OSPB in the opposite direction-such that the object files appeared to have `bounced' even though the percept `streamed'. Given that OSPBs have been taken as a hallmark of the operation of object files, the five experiments reported here suggest that in at least some specialized (and perhaps ecologically invalid) cases, conscious percepts of `which went where' in dynamic ambiguous displays can diverge from the mapping computed by the object-file system. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 92
页数:26
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DIALOGUES PERCEPTION
[2]   OBJECT PERMANENCE IN 5-MONTH-OLD INFANTS [J].
BAILLARGEON, R ;
SPELKE, ES ;
WASSERMAN, S .
COGNITION, 1985, 20 (03) :191-208
[3]   Young infants' expectations about hidden objects: a reply to three challenges [J].
Baillargeon, Renee .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 1999, 2 (02) :115-132
[4]   DIRECTIONAL BIAS IN THE PERCEPTION OF TRANSLATING PATTERNS [J].
BERTENTHAL, BI ;
BANTON, T ;
BRADBURY, A .
PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (02) :193-207
[5]  
Bloom P., 2002, CHILDREN LEARN MEANI
[6]   Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking [J].
Carey, S ;
Xu, F .
COGNITION, 2001, 80 (1-2) :179-213
[7]   Infants' tracking of objects and collections [J].
Chiang, WC ;
Wynn, K .
COGNITION, 2000, 77 (03) :169-195
[8]  
COMTOIS R, 2003, VISIONSHELL PPC
[9]   The representations underlying infants' choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes [J].
Feigenson, L ;
Carey, S ;
Hauser, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (02) :150-156
[10]  
FELDMAN J, UNPUB INDIVIDUATION