Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Detection in Community Mammography Practice

被引:129
作者
Fenton, Joshua J. [1 ,2 ]
Abraham, Linn [3 ]
Taplin, Stephen H. [4 ]
Geller, Berta M. [5 ]
Carney, Patricia A. [6 ]
D'Orsi, Carl [7 ]
Elmore, Joann G. [8 ,9 ]
Barlow, William E. [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Family & Community Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Healthcare Policy & Res, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Grp Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[4] NCI, Appl Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Dept Family Med, Off Hlth Promot Res, Burlington, VT USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[10] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
POSTMENOPAUSAL HORMONE-THERAPY; ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN; BREAST-CANCER DETECTION; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DETECTION SYSTEM; UNITED-STATES; IN-SITU; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djr206
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Computer-aided detection (CAD) is applied during screening mammography for millions of US women annually, although it is uncertain whether CAD improves breast cancer detection when used by community radiologists. Methods We investigated the association between CAD use during film-screen screening mammography and specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, cancer detection rates, and prognostic characteristics of breast cancers (stage, size, and node involvement). Records from 684 956 women who received more than 1.6 million film-screen mammograms at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium facilities in seven states in the United States from 1998 to 2006 were analyzed. We used random-effects logistic regression to estimate associations between CAD and specificity (true-negative examinations among women without breast cancer), sensitivity (true-positive examinations among women with breast cancer diagnosed within 1 year of mammography), and positive predictive value (breast cancer diagnosed after positive mammograms) while adjusting for mammography registry, patient age, time since previous mammography, breast density, use of hormone replacement therapy, and year of examination (1998-2002 vs 2003-2006). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Of 90 total facilities, 25 (27.8%) adopted CAD and used it for an average of 27.5 study months. In adjusted analyses, CAD use was associated with statistically significantly lower specificity (OR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85 to 0.89, P < .001) and positive predictive value (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.99, P = .03). A non-statistically significant increase in overall sensitivity with CAD (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.33, P = .62) was attributed to increased sensitivity for ductal carcinoma in situ (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.83 to 2.91; P = .17), although sensitivity for invasive cancer was similar with or without CAD (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.24; P = .77). CAD was not associated with higher breast cancer detection rates or more favorable stage, size, or lymph node status of invasive breast cancer. Conclusion CAD use during film-screen screening mammography in the United States is associated with decreased specificity but not with improvement in the detection rate or prognostic characteristics of invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1152-1161
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1161
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation [J].
Alberdi, E ;
Povyakalo, AA ;
Strigini, L ;
Ayton, P ;
Hartswood, M ;
Procter, R ;
Slack, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 :S31-S40
[2]   Advanced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Mortality in Randomized Controlled Trials on Mammography Screening [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Hery, Clarisse ;
Haukka, Jari ;
Boniol, Mathieu ;
Byrnes, Graham .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (35) :5919-5923
[3]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[4]   Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting [J].
Birdwell, RL ;
Bandodkar, P ;
Ikeda, DM .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) :451-457
[5]   Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection [J].
Birdwell, RL ;
Ikeda, DM ;
O'Shaughnessy, KF ;
Sickles, EA .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :192-202
[6]   The Preponderance of Evidence Supports Computer-aided Detection for Screening Mammography [J].
Birdwell, Robyn L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (01) :9-16
[7]   Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? [J].
Brancato, Beniamino ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Francesca, Damiana ;
Bianchi, Simonetta ;
Risso, Gabriella ;
Catarzi, Sandra ;
Taschini, Renzo ;
Del Turco, Marco Rosselli ;
Ciatto, Stefano .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 111 (02) :373-376
[8]   Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology [J].
Brem, RF ;
Rapelyea, JA ;
Zisman, G ;
Hoffmeister, JW ;
DeSimio, MP .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (05) :931-935
[9]  
Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
[10]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008