Concordance between verbal report and urine screen of recent marijuana use in adolescents

被引:43
作者
Akinci, IH [1 ]
Tarter, RE [1 ]
Kirisci, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Ctr Educ & Drug Abuse Res, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
self-report; substance use; urine test;
D O I
10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00146-5
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study compared the concordance of self-report for recent marijuana use with results obtained from urine drug screen. The sample consisted of adolescent sons of fathers with DSM-III-R lifetime substance use disorder (SUD) [high average risk (HAR); N = 75] and sons of fathers with no Axis 1 psychiatric or SUD [low average risk (LAR); N = 125]. To avoid recall bias, and to ensure that the timeframe for accurate detection was restricted to promote accuracy, urine drug screen results were compared to self-reported marijuana use during the prior 48 h using an interview format. The HAR group of adolescents reported a higher rate of recent cannabis use and also had a higher rate of cannabis detection as measured in urine. The two groups did not differ with respect to either over or under-reporting marijuana use. Overall, of 19 participants who obtained positive urine cannabis results, six (31.5%) verbally denied that they used marijuana within the previous 2 days. Among the 181 participants who obtained a negative urine drug screen, 20 subjects (11.5%) inaccurately asserted that they had used marijuana within the prior 2 days. In total, 13% of the participants (26/200) inaccurately reported recent cannabis use. These results underscore the need for caution in interpreting the results of self-report methods documenting the prevalence of drug use among youth. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 619
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   RETROSPECTIVE SELF-REPORTS BY CLIENTS DIFFER FROM ORIGINAL REPORTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION OF DRUG-TREATMENT PROGRAMS [J].
AIKEN, LS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1986, 21 (07) :767-788
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[3]  
ASHBERG K, 1994, RHODE ISLAND MED, V77, P371
[4]   ASSESSING DRUG-USE PREVALENCE IN THE WORKPLACE - A COMPARISON OF SELF-REPORT METHODS AND URINALYSIS [J].
COOK, RF ;
BERNSTEIN, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1994, 29 (08) :1057-1068
[5]  
Fendrich M, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V149, P955
[6]   Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients, and arrestees [J].
Hser, YI ;
Maglione, M ;
Boyle, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 1999, 25 (01) :81-91
[7]  
LECKMAN JF, 1982, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V39, P879
[8]   THE VALIDITY OF METHADONE CLIENTS SELF-REPORTED DRUG-USE [J].
MAGURA, S ;
GOLDSMITH, D ;
CASRIEL, C ;
GOLDSTEIN, PJ ;
LIPTON, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1987, 22 (08) :727-749
[9]   VALIDATION OF SELF-REPORTED CANNABIS USE BY URINE ANALYSIS [J].
MARTIN, GW ;
WILKINSON, DA ;
KAPUR, BM .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1988, 13 (02) :147-150
[10]   RELIABILITY OF BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM COURT-STIPULATED CLIENTS NEWLY ADMITTED TO TREATMENT [J].
POMPI, KF ;
SHREINER, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 1979, 6 (01) :79-95