Sustained benefit over four years from an initial combined antiplatelet regimen after coronary stent placement in the ISAR trial

被引:14
作者
Schühlen, H
Kastrati, A
Pache, J
Dirschinger, J
Schömig, A
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Med Klin 1, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01390-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Combined antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent placement is superior to anticoagulation with respect to early outcome. It is unclear if this benefit is maintained during long-term follow-up. This study reports on the 4-year clinical outcome of patients randomized in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen trial. In the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen trial, 517 patients were randomized after successful placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents: 257 to aspirin and ticlopidine, and 260 to aspirin and phenprocoumon. Ticlopidine and phenprocoumon were given for 4 weeks. At 30 days, patients with ticlopidine had significantly fewer adverse cardiac events (1.6% vs 6,2%; p = 0.007), nonfatal myocardial infarction (0.8% vs 3.5%; p = 0.034), and target vessel revascularization procedures (1.2% vs 5.4%; p = 0.007). At 4 years, rates for any adverse cardiac events were 22.6% versus 28.5% (p = 0.078), for nonfatal myocardial infarction 0.9% versus 5.8% (p = 0.003), and for target vessel revascularization 18.3% versus 22.7% (p = 0.21). The absolute difference in event rates (4.6% after 30 days) was maintained after 4 years (5.9%). Event rates beyond day 30 were not significantly different (21.1% vs 22.5%; p 0.78), nor were the rates beyond the first year, which were very low (5.2% vs 3.6%; p = 0.50). This study shows that the benefit of combined antiplatelet therapy evident alter 30 days is maintained after 4 years. Independent of the initial regimen, rates of adverse cardiac events are low beyond the first year. (C) 2001 by Excerpta Medico, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 400
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*BEN 1 STUD GROUP, 1999, CIRCULATION, V100, P233
[2]   Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting - The full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (FANTASTIC) study [J].
Bertrand, ME ;
Legrand, V ;
Boland, J ;
Fleck, E ;
Bonnier, J ;
Emmanuelson, H ;
Vrolix, M ;
Missault, L ;
Chierchia, S ;
Casaccia, M ;
Niccoli, L ;
Oto, A ;
White, C ;
Webb-Peploe, M ;
Van Belle, E ;
McFadden, EP .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (16) :1597-1603
[3]   Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START) -: A four-year follow-up [J].
Betriu, A ;
Masotti, M ;
Serra, A ;
Alonso, J ;
Fernández-Avilés, F ;
Gimeno, F ;
Colman, T ;
Zueco, J ;
Delcan, JL ;
García, E ;
Calabuig, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (05) :1498-1506
[4]  
Kastrati A, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P462
[5]   Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents [J].
Kimura, T ;
Yokoi, H ;
Nakagawa, Y ;
Tamura, T ;
Kaburagi, S ;
Sawada, Y ;
Sato, Y ;
Yokoi, H ;
Hamasaki, N ;
Nosaka, H ;
Nobuyoshi, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (09) :561-566
[6]   Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stenting [J].
Klugherz, BD ;
DeAngelo, DL ;
Kim, BK ;
Herrmann, HC ;
Hirshfeld, JW ;
Kolansky, DM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 27 (05) :1185-1191
[7]   Long-term (4- to 6-year) outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting: Paucity of late clinical stent-related problems [J].
Laham, RJ ;
Carrozza, JP ;
Berger, C ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Kuntz, RE ;
Baim, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 28 (04) :820-826
[8]   A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting [J].
Leon, MB ;
Baim, DS ;
Popma, JJ ;
Gordon, PC ;
Cutlip, DE ;
Ho, KKL ;
Giambartolome, A ;
Diver, DJ ;
Lasorda, DM ;
Williams, DO ;
Pocock, SJ ;
Kuntz, RE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (23) :1665-1671
[9]   Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: One-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial [J].
Macaya, C ;
Serruys, PW ;
Ruygrok, P ;
Suryapranata, H ;
Mast, G ;
Klugmann, S ;
Urban, P ;
denHeijer, P ;
Koch, K ;
Simon, R ;
Morice, MC ;
Crean, P ;
Bonnier, H ;
Wijns, W ;
Danchin, N ;
Bourdonnec, C ;
Morel, MA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 27 (02) :255-261
[10]   LONG-TERM ANGIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER IMPLANTATION OF A BALLOON-EXPANDABLE STENT IN THE NATIVE CORONARY CIRCULATION [J].
SAVAGE, MP ;
FISCHMAN, DL ;
SCHATZ, RA ;
TEIRSTEIN, PS ;
LEON, MB ;
BAIM, D ;
ELLIS, SG ;
TOPOL, EJ ;
HIRSHFELD, JW ;
CLEMAN, MW ;
BUCHBINDER, M ;
BAILEY, S ;
HEUSER, R ;
WALKER, CM ;
CURRY, RC ;
GEBHARDT, S ;
RAKE, R ;
GOLDBERG, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (05) :1207-1212