Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis

被引:515
作者
Banker, Rajiv D. [1 ]
Natarajan, Ram [2 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Business & Management, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Management, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1287/opre.1070.0460
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A DEA-based stochastic frontier estimation framework is presented to evaluate contextual variables affecting productivity that allows for both one-sided inefficiency deviations as well as two-sided random noise. Conditions are identified under which a two-stage procedure consisting of DEA followed by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis yields consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables. Conditions are also identified under which DEA in the first stage followed by maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) in the second stage yields consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables. This requires the contextual variables to be independent of the input variables, but the contextual variables may be correlated with each other. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to compare the performance of our two-stage approach with one-stage and two-stage parametric approaches. Simulation results indicate that DEA-based procedures with OLS, maximum likelihood, or even Tobit estimation in the second stage perform as well as the best of the parametric methods in the estimation of the impact of contextual variables on productivity. Simulation results also indicate that DEA-based procedures perform better than parametric methods in the estimation of individual decision-making unit (DMU) productivity. Overall, the results establish DEA as a nonparametric stochastic frontier estimation (SFE) methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 58
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[2]  
AIGNER DJ, 1968, AM ECON REV, V58, P826
[3]   A MONTE-CARLO COMPARISON OF 2 PRODUCTION FRONTIER ESTIMATION METHODS - CORRECTED ORDINARY LEAST-SQUARES AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
GADH, VM ;
GORR, WL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 67 (03) :332-343
[4]   Evaluating the adequacy of parametric functional forms in estimating monotone and concave production functions [J].
Banker, RD ;
Janakiraman, S ;
Natarajan, R .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (1-2) :111-132
[5]   A simulation study of DEA and parametric frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasticity [J].
Banker, RD ;
Chang, HH ;
Cooper, WW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (03) :624-640
[6]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[7]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD, CONSISTENCY AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS - A STATISTICAL FOUNDATION [J].
BANKER, RD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1265-1273
[8]  
FARRELL MJ, 1957, J ROYAL STATISTICA A, V120, P253, DOI DOI 10.2307/2343100
[9]  
FORSUND FR, 1999, EVOLUTION DEA EC PER
[10]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF ECONOMETRIC FRONTIER FUNCTIONS [J].
GREENE, WH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1980, 13 (01) :27-56