New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity

被引:247
作者
Bijmolt, THA [1 ]
Van Heerde, HJ
Pieters, RGM
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.42.2.141.62296
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The importance of pricing decisions for firms has fueled an extensive stream of research on price elasticities. In an influential meta-analytical study, Tellis (1988) summarized price elasticity research findings until 1986. However, empirical generalizations on price elasticity require modifications because of (1) changes in market characteristics (i.e., characteristics of brands, product categories, and economic conditions) and (2) changes in the research methodology used to assess price elasticities. Therefore, the authors present a meta-analysis of price elasticity with new empirical generalizations on its determinants. Across a set of 1851 price elasticities based on 81 studies, the average price elasticity is -2.62. A salient finding is that over the past four decades, sales elasticities have significantly increased in magnitude, whereas share and choice elasticities have remained fairly constant. The authors find that accommodating price endogeneity has a strong (magnitude-increasing) impact on price elasticities. A striking null result is that accounting for heterogeneity does not affect elasticities significantly. The authors also present an analysis that explains the difference between their findings and Tellis's findings, and they indicate which new price elasticity studies are most desirable.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 156
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Heterogeneity and purchase event feedback in choice models: An empirical analysis with implications for model building [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Gedenk, K ;
Neslin, SA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 1999, 16 (03) :177-198
[2]   Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble's value pricing strategy [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Lehmann, DR ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) :44-61
[3]  
[Anonymous], J MARKETING MANAGEME
[4]  
[Anonymous], MARKETING LETT
[5]   The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization [J].
Bell, DR ;
Chiang, JW ;
Padmanabhan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :504-526
[6]   Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework [J].
Besanko, D ;
Gupta, S ;
Jain, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (11) :1533-1547
[7]  
Bhargava M., 1994, MARKET LETT, V5, P141, DOI 10.1007/BF00994104
[8]   Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements [J].
Bijmolt, THA ;
Pieters, RGM .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2001, 12 (02) :157-169
[9]  
BLOOM D, 1980, J MARKET RES SOC, V22, P221
[10]  
BOLTON RN, 1989, J RETAILING, V65, P193