Clinical Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System: Dosimetric Characterization

被引:124
作者
Feng, Steve Si Jia
Sechopoulos, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIATION; UK;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11111789
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To comprehensively characterize the dosimetric properties of a clinical digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) system for the acquisition of mammographic and tomosynthesis images. Materials and Methods: Compressible water-oil mixture phantoms were created and imaged by using the automatic exposure control (AEC) of the Selenia Dimensions system (Hologic, Bedford, Mass) in both DBT and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) mode. Empirical measurements of the x-ray tube output were performed with a dosimeter to measure the air kerma for the range of tube current-exposure time product settings and to develop models of the automatically selected x-ray spectra. A Monte Carlo simulation of the system was developed and used in conjunction with the AEC-chosen settings and spectra models to compute and compare the mean glandular dose (MGD) resulting from both imaging modalities for breasts of varying sizes and glandular compositions. Results: Acquisition of a single craniocaudal view resulted in an MGD ranging from 0.309 to 5.26 mGy in FFDM mode and from 0.657 to 3.52 mGy in DBT mode. For a breast with a compressed thickness of 5.0 cm and a 50% glandular fraction, a DBT acquisition resulted in an only 8% higher MGD than an FFDM acquisition (1.30 and 1.20 mGy, respectively). For a breast with a compressed thickness of 6.0 cm and a 14.3% glandular fraction, a DBT acquisition resulted in an 83% higher MGD than an FFDM acquisition (2.12 and 1.16 mGy, respectively). Conclusion: For two-dimensional-three-dimensional fusion imaging with the Selenia Dimensions system, the MGD for a 5-cm-thick 50% glandular breast is 2.50 mGy, which is less than the Mammography Quality Standards Act limit for a two-view screening mammography study. (C) RSNA, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   GEANT4-a simulation toolkit [J].
Agostinelli, S ;
Allison, J ;
Amako, K ;
Apostolakis, J ;
Araujo, H ;
Arce, P ;
Asai, M ;
Axen, D ;
Banerjee, S ;
Barrand, G ;
Behner, F ;
Bellagamba, L ;
Boudreau, J ;
Broglia, L ;
Brunengo, A ;
Burkhardt, H ;
Chauvie, S ;
Chuma, J ;
Chytracek, R ;
Cooperman, G ;
Cosmo, G ;
Degtyarenko, P ;
Dell'Acqua, A ;
Depaola, G ;
Dietrich, D ;
Enami, R ;
Feliciello, A ;
Ferguson, C ;
Fesefeldt, H ;
Folger, G ;
Foppiano, F ;
Forti, A ;
Garelli, S ;
Giani, S ;
Giannitrapani, R ;
Gibin, D ;
Cadenas, JJG ;
González, I ;
Abril, GG ;
Greeniaus, G ;
Greiner, W ;
Grichine, V ;
Grossheim, A ;
Guatelli, S ;
Gumplinger, P ;
Hamatsu, R ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Hasui, H ;
Heikkinen, A ;
Howard, A .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) :250-303
[2]   Geant4 developments and applications [J].
Allison, J ;
Amako, K ;
Apostolakis, J ;
Araujo, H ;
Dubois, PA ;
Asai, M ;
Barrand, G ;
Capra, R ;
Chauvie, S ;
Chytracek, R ;
Cirrone, GAP ;
Cooperman, G ;
Cosmo, G ;
Cuttone, G ;
Daquino, GG ;
Donszelmann, M ;
Dressel, M ;
Folger, G ;
Foppiano, F ;
Generowicz, J ;
Grichine, V ;
Guatelli, S ;
Gumplinger, P ;
Heikkinen, A ;
Hrivnacova, I ;
Howard, A ;
Incerti, S ;
Ivanchenko, V ;
Johnson, T ;
Jones, F ;
Koi, T ;
Kokoulin, R ;
Kossov, M ;
Kurashige, H ;
Lara, V ;
Larsson, S ;
Lei, F ;
Link, O ;
Longo, F ;
Maire, M ;
Mantero, A ;
Mascialino, B ;
McLaren, I ;
Lorenzo, PM ;
Minamimoto, K ;
Murakami, K ;
Nieminen, P ;
Pandola, L ;
Parlati, S ;
Peralta, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2006, 53 (01) :270-278
[3]   Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings [J].
Andersson, Ingvar ;
Ikeda, Debra M. ;
Zackrisson, Sophia ;
Ruschin, Mark ;
Svahn, Tony ;
Timberg, Pontus ;
Tingberg, Anders .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) :2817-2825
[4]   Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment [J].
Boone, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :23-37
[5]   Scatter/primary in mammography: Comprehensive results [J].
Boone, JM ;
Lindfors, KK ;
Cooper, VN ;
Seibert, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (10) :2408-2416
[6]   Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography [J].
Boone, JM ;
Fewell, TR ;
Jennings, RJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :1863-1874
[7]   Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data [J].
Boone, JM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :869-875
[8]   Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols [J].
Dance, D. R. ;
Young, K. C. ;
van Engen, R. E. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (02) :453-471
[9]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study [J].
Gur, David ;
Abrams, Gordon S. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Perrin, Ronald L. ;
Rathfon, Grace Y. ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Bandos, Andriy I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (02) :586-591
[10]  
HAMMERSTEIN GR, 1979, RADIOLOGY, V130, P485