The structure and conduct of corporate lobbying: How firms lobby the Federal Communications Commission

被引:65
作者
de Figueiredo, JM [1 ]
Tiller, EH
机构
[1] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/105864001300122566
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the amount and organization (individual vs. collective) of lobbying by firms in administrative agencies. It explores the power and limitations of the collective-action theories and transaction-cost theories in explaining lobbying. It introduces a dataset of over 900 lobbying contacts covering 101 issues at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in early 1998. It finds that the structure and conduct of large-firm lobbying at the FCC is consistent with the predictions of theories of transaction costs and the main results of theories of collective action. Small firms show little sensitivity to collective-action issues or transaction-cost issues in the organization of their lobbying, but they do lobby less when having to reveal proprietary information. In sum, large firms behave in a manner largely consistent with theoretical predictions, while small firms do not.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 122
页数:32
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BUSINESS ITS ENV
[2]  
ANSOLABEHERE S, 2000, CAMPAIGNE CONTRIBUTI
[3]   COUNTERACTIVE LOBBYING [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D ;
WRIGHT, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 38 (01) :25-44
[4]  
Baron D., 1999, BUSINESS POLITICS, V1, P7
[5]  
Baron DP, 1997, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V6, P291, DOI 10.1162/105864097567110
[6]  
Belsley D.A., 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
[7]  
BENDOR J, 1987, AM POLIT SCI REV, V81, P128
[8]   REGRESSION-BASED TESTS FOR OVERDISPERSION IN THE POISSON MODEL [J].
CAMERON, AC ;
TRIVEDI, PK .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (03) :347-364
[9]  
Coleman William D, 1988, Business and Politics: A Study of Collective Action
[10]  
DEFIGUEIREDO JM, 1996, IND CORP CHANGE, V5, P537, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/5.2.537