Exploring Motivations for Online Privacy Protection Behavior: Insights From Panel Data

被引:156
作者
Boerman, Sophie C. [1 ]
Kruikemeier, Sanne [2 ]
Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, Persuas Commun, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, Polit Commun, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Informat Law IViR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
privacy; protective behavior; protection motivation theory; cookies; ad blockers; Internet; computer-mediated communication; survey; panel data; SELF-DISCLOSURE; FEAR APPEALS; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE; GENDER; SEALS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0093650218800915
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Personally managing and protecting online privacy has become an essential part of everyday life. This research draws on the protection motivation theory (PMT) to investigate privacy protective behavior online. A two-wave panel study (N = 928) shows that (1) people rarely to occasionally protect their online privacy and (2) people most often delete cookies and browser history or decline cookies to protect their online privacy. In addition, (3) the perceived threat is high: People perceive the collection, usage, and sharing of personal information as a severe problem to which they are susceptible. The coping appraisal is mixed: Although people do have confidence in some protective measures, they have little confidence in their own efficacy to protect their online privacy. Moreover, privacy protective behavior is affected by perceived severity and response efficacy. These findings emphasize the relevance of the PMT in the context of privacy threats, and have important implications for regulators.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 977
页数:25
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   The Web Never Forgets: Persistent Tracking Mechanisms in the Wild [J].
Acar, Gunes ;
Eubank, Christian ;
Englehardt, Steven ;
Juarez, Marc ;
Narayanan, Arvind ;
Diaz, Claudia .
CCS'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, 2014, :674-689
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, BEHAV ADVERTISING OF
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Adnostic: Privacy preserving targeted advertising *
[5]  
Balebako Rebecca, 2012, W2SP WORKSHOP
[6]  
Bandura A., 1978, Psychological Review, V1, P139, DOI [10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4, DOI 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191]
[7]   Online Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management: A Meta-Analytical Review [J].
Baruh, Lemi ;
Secinti, Ekin ;
Cemalcilar, Zeynep .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2017, 67 (01) :26-53
[8]   Big data analytics and the limits of privacy self-management [J].
Baruh, Lemi ;
Popescu, Mihaela .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2017, 19 (04) :579-596
[9]   Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda [J].
Boerman, Sophie C. ;
Kruikemeier, Sanne ;
Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (03) :363-376
[10]  
Borgesius Fredrik Zuiderveen, 2017, An Assessment of the Commission's Proposal on Privacy and Electronic Communications