Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: A needle placement accuracy study

被引:68
作者
Blumenfeld, Philip
Hata, Nobuhiko
DiMaio, Simon
Zou, Kelly
Haker, Steven
Fichtinger, Gabor
Tempany, Clare M. C.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Engn Res Ctr Comp Integrated Surg Syst & Technol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
intraoperative MRI; biopsy; prostate; needle misplacement; accuracy assessment;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21067
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify needle placement accuracy of magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 biopsies were performed with 18-gauge (G) core biopsy needle via a percutaneous transperineal approach. Needle placement error was assessed by comparing the coordinates of preplanned targets with the needle tip measured from the intraprocedural coherent gradient echo images. The source of these errors was subsequently investigated by measuring displacement caused by needle deflection and needle susceptibility artifact shift in controlled phantom studies. Needle placement error due to misalignment of the needle template guide was also evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation (SD) of errors in targeted biopsies was 6.5 +/- 3.5 mm. Phantom experiments showed significant placement error due to needle deflection with a needle with an asymmetrically beveled tip (3.2-8.7 mm depending on tissue type) but significantly smaller error with a symmetrical bevel (0.6-1.1 mm). Needle susceptibility artifacts observed a shift of 1.6 +/- 0.4 mm from the true needle axis. Misalignment of the needle template guide contributed an error of 1.5 +/- 0.3 mm. Conclusion: Needle placement error was clinically significant in MRI-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Needle placement error due to needle deflection was the most significant cause of error, especially for needles with an asymmetrical bevel.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 694
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Adusumilli Saroja, 2002, Semin Urol Oncol, V20, P192, DOI 10.1053/suro.2002.35333
[2]   MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: Initial results [J].
Beyersdorff, D ;
Winkel, A ;
Hamm, B ;
Lenk, S ;
Loening, SA ;
Taupitz, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :576-581
[3]  
Butts K, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V9, P586, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199904)9:4<586::AID-JMRI13>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-X
[5]   Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Tempany, CM ;
Cormack, R ;
Hata, N ;
Jinzaki, M ;
Tuncali, K ;
Weinstein, M ;
Richie, JP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) :385-387
[6]   Interactive simulation of needle insertion models [J].
DiMaio, SP ;
Salcudean, SE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 52 (07) :1167-1179
[7]   Needle steering and motion planning in soft tissues [J].
DiMaio, SP ;
Salcudean, SE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 52 (06) :965-974
[8]   Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration [J].
Fitzpatrick, JM ;
West, JB ;
Maurer, CR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (05) :694-702
[9]   MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: Device validation and feasibility [J].
Hata, N ;
Jinzaki, M ;
Kacher, D ;
Cormak, R ;
Gering, D ;
Nabavi, A ;
Silverman, SG ;
D'Amico, AV ;
Kikinis, R ;
Jolesz, FA ;
Tempany, CMC .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :263-268
[10]   CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION OF ABSOLUTE ORIENTATION USING ORTHONORMAL MATRICES [J].
HORN, BKP ;
HILDEN, HM ;
NEGAHDARIPOUR, S .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (07) :1127-1135