The Group Dynamics of Interorganizational Relationships: Collaborating with Multiple Partners in Innovation Ecosystems

被引:167
作者
Davis, Jason P. [1 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Entrepreneurship, 1 Ayer Rajah Ave, Singapore 138676, Singapore
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
collaborative innovation; organizational innovation; alliances; triads; technology; strategy; network forms; product development; research and development; interorganizational relations; conflict and cooperation; supradyadic mechanisms; ecosystems; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS; ALLIANCE FORMATION; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; BUSINESS GROUPS; LOCAL SEARCH; EMBEDDEDNESS; COOPERATION; NETWORKS; TIES;
D O I
10.1177/0001839216649350
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines how organizations collaborate with multiple partners, such as when they develop innovative and complex product platforms like smartphones, servers, and MRI machines that rely on technologies developed by organizations in three or more sectors. Research on multipartner alliances often treats them as a collection of independent dyads, neglecting the possibility of third-party influence and interference in dyads that can inhibit innovation. Using a multiple-case, inductive study of six groups, each composed of three organizations engaged in technology and product development in the computer industry, I examine the collaborative forms and processes that organizations use to innovate with multiple partners in groups. Groups that used the collaborative forms of independent parallel dyads or single unified triads generated mistrust and conflict that stemmed from expectations about third-party participation and overlapping roles and thus had low innovation performance and weaker ties. Other groups avoided these problems by using a dynamic collaboration process that I call group cycling, in which managers viewed their triad as a small group, decomposed innovative activities into a series of interlinked dyads between different pairs of partners, and managed third-party interests across time. By temporarily restricting participation to pairs, managers chose which ideas, technologies, and resources to incorporate from third parties into single dyads and ensured that the outputs of multiple dyads were combined into a broader innovative whole.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 661
页数:41
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[2]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-B
[4]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[5]  
Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the RD organization
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1884, FLATLAND ROMANCE MAN
[7]   Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Embeddedness Failure in the Pharmaceutical Industry [J].
Azoulay, Pierre ;
Repenning, Nelson P. ;
Zuckerman, Ezra W. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 55 (03) :472-507
[8]   Relational contracts and the theory of the firm [J].
Baker, G ;
Gibbons, R ;
Murphy, KJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (01) :39-84
[9]  
Baldwin C.Y., 2000, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, DOI [DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2366.001.0001, 10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001]
[10]   The Architecture of complexity [J].
Barabasi, Albert-Lashlo .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2007, 27 (04) :33-42