Coupling a grassland ecosystem model with Landsat imagery for a 10-year simulation of carbon and water budgets

被引:63
作者
Nouvellon, Y
Moran, MS
Lo Seen, D
Bryant, R
Rambal, S
Ni, WM
Bégué, A
Chehbouni, A
Emmerich, WE
Heilman, P
Qi, JG
机构
[1] CIRAD, FORET, Programme Arbres & Plantat, AMIS, F-34398 Montpellier 5, France
[2] USDA ARS, SWRC, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] CEFE, CNRS, DREAM Unit, Montpellier, France
[4] CESBIO, CNES, CNRS, UPS,IRD, Toulouse, France
[5] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00255-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, high-spatial, low-temporal scale visible remote sensing data were used to calibrate an ecosystem model (EM) for semiarid perennial grasslands. The model was driven by daily meteorological data and simulated plant growth and water budget on the same time step. The model was coupled with a canopy reflectance model to yield the time course of shortwave radiometric profiles. Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced TM Plus (ETM+) images from 10 consecutive years were used to refine the model on a spatially distributed basis. A calibration procedure, which minimized the difference between the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) simulated from the coupled model and measured by the TM and ETM+ sensors, yielded the spatial distribution of an unknown parameter and initial condition. Accuracy of model products, such as daily aboveground biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and soil water content, was assessed by comparing them with field measurements. The promising results suggest that this approach could provide spatially distributed information about both vegetation and soil conditions for day-to-day grassland management. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 149
页数:19
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
AMER SA, 1994, WATER RESOUR BULL, V30, P69
[2]  
[Anonymous], REMOTE SENSING ENV, DOI DOI 10.1080/02757259509532290
[3]   Variability in leaf and litter optical properties: Implications for BRDF model inversions using AVHRR, MODIS, and MISR [J].
Asner, GP ;
Wessman, CA ;
Schimel, DS ;
Archer, S .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 63 (03) :243-257
[4]   A SIMULATION-MODEL OF INTRASEASONAL CARBON AND NITROGEN DYNAMICS OF BLUE GRAMA SWARDS AS INFLUENCED BY ABOVE-GROUND AND BELOWGROUND GRAZING [J].
BACHELET, D ;
HUNT, HW ;
DETLING, JK .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1989, 44 (3-4) :231-252
[5]  
Baldocchi D, 1994, EXPLOITATION ENV HET, P21
[6]  
BEGUE A, 2001, UNPUB REMOTE SENSING
[7]   Potential uses and limitations of crop models [J].
Boote, KJ ;
Jones, JW ;
Pickering, NB .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1996, 88 (05) :704-716
[8]   LINKING PHYSICAL REMOTE-SENSING MODELS WITH CROP GROWTH SIMULATION-MODELS, APPLIED FOR SUGAR-BEET [J].
BOUMAN, BAM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1992, 13 (14) :2565-2581
[9]  
BRECKENFELD DJ, 1995, UD DEPT AGR SOIL CON
[10]   Calibrating a soil water and energy budget model with remotely sensed data to obtain quantitative information about the soil [J].
Burke, EJ ;
Gurney, RJ ;
Simmonds, LP ;
Jackson, TJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (07) :1689-1697