Toward an Organizational Theory of Resilience: An Interim Struggle

被引:46
作者
Kantabutra, Sooksan [1 ]
Ketprapakorn, Nuttasorn [2 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Coll Management, Ctr Res Sustainable Leadership, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Univ Thai Chamber Commerce, Sch Business, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
corporate sustainability; resilience; organizational resilience; theory building; sustainability; general systems theory; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; THREAT-RIGIDITY; FUTURE; FRAMEWORK; LEADERSHIP; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su132313137
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While organizational resilience is widely considered as critical to sustainability, gaps in both the scholarly and professional literature exist. First, stronger conceptualization of the term is needed. Second, little is known about how organizational resilience can be continuously accomplished via daily practices and processes. Finally, the ongoing organization theory development does not sufficiently address these gaps. Contributing to the literature by filling in these fundamental gaps, the present study integrates the disconnectedly growing literature into an organizational theory of resilience. Based on the General Systems Theory, the resulting theory comprises inputs of human resources, socio-cultural values, institutional settings, and social and environmental issues, enabling organizational structure, value and belief subsystem, resilience mindset, sustainability practices, adaptive and buffering capacities, and sustainability performance as the output. Their dynamic relationships are discussed and expressed via a model and propositions, followed by implications for researchers and practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]   Company disclosures concerning the resilience of cities from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) perspective [J].
Acuti, Diletta ;
Bellucci, Marco ;
Manetti, Giacomo .
CITIES, 2020, 99
[2]   Aligning Key Concepts for Global Change Policy: Robustness, Resilience, and Sustainability [J].
Anderies, John M. ;
Folke, Carl ;
Walker, Brian ;
Ostrom, Elinor .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (02)
[3]   Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures [J].
Andersson, Thomas ;
Caker, Mikael ;
Tengblad, Stefan ;
Wickelgren, Mikael .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 35 (01) :36-45
[4]   Integrating public service motivation and self-determination theory A framework [J].
Andrews, Christina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2016, 29 (03) :238-254
[5]  
Andriof J., 2017, UNFOLDING STAKEHOLDE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2024, RESILIENCE BEHAV LAR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, LEADERSHIP SUSTAINAB, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781845425494
[8]   Redefining, relooking, redesigning, and reincorporating HRD in the post Covid 19 context and thereafter [J].
Arora, Pallvi ;
Suri, Divij .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 23 (04) :438-451
[9]   THE SYSTEMS PARADIGM IN ORGANIZATION THEORY - CORRECTING THE RECORD AND SUGGESTING THE FUTURE [J].
ASHMOS, DP ;
HUBER, GP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1987, 12 (04) :607-621
[10]  
Avery G., 2010, Honeybees and locusts: The business case for sustainable leadership