THE ROLE OF EGO NETWORK STRUCTURE IN FACILITATING EGO NETWORK INNOVATIONS

被引:95
作者
Carnovale, Steven [1 ]
Yeniyurt, Sengun [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Supply & Logist Management Grp, Sch Business Adm, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
关键词
supply chain innovation; network innovation; joint ventures; ego network; archival data; time series analysis; ZERO-INFLATED POISSON; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; HOLES; COLLABORATION; REGRESSION; MODELS; INNOVATIVENESS; EMBEDDEDNESS; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1111/jscm.12075
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A great deal of research on innovation implicitly relies upon the network in which a firm is embedded to explain its innovative capabilities. Interestingly, however, most research examines innovation at the firm level, rather than at the network level. Thus, there is a significant gap in the literature regarding the effects of network structure on innovation within a firm's network. In this research, we contribute to the literature of supply chain innovations by developing and testing theoretically derived hypotheses regarding the effect of network structure on innovation output and distribution, as measured by the aggregate count and variance in the distribution of patents of the ego network in which a firm exists. Utilizing a manufacturing joint venture network dataset, we identify effects of various ego network constructs such as betweenness, density, brokerage, and weakness on ego network innovation. We find support for the idea that innovation in a supply chain is highly dependent upon the network structure of the interfirm relationships. Thus, it is not just what you know or how well you individually innovate, but also how well the firm can leverage its supply network connections that engender superior innovation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 46
页数:25
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Adler PaulS., 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17, DOI [10.5465/amr.2002.5922314, DOI 10.2307/4134367]
[2]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1939, Bull. Mosc. Univ, DOI DOI 10.12691/AJSSM-2-1-2
[6]   SUPPLY CHAIN CAPITAL: THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL AND RELATIONAL LINKAGES ON FIRM EXECUTION AND INNOVATION [J].
Autry, Chad W. ;
Griffis, Stanley E. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2008, 29 (01) :157-+
[7]   BENEFITING FROM SUPPLIER OPERATIONAL INNOVATIVENESS: THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY [J].
Azadegan, Arash .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (02) :49-64
[8]   Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment [J].
Azadegan, Arash ;
Dooley, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (06) :488-505
[9]   SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES [J].
Azadegan, Arash ;
Dooley, Kevin J. ;
Carter, Phillip L. ;
Carter, Joseph R. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 44 (04) :14-35
[10]   Who's Seeking Whom? Coalition Behavior of a Weaker Player in Buyer-Supplier Relationships [J].
Bastl, Marko ;
Johnson, Mark ;
Choi, Thomas Y. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2013, 49 (01) :8-28