Horizontal inequity comparisons

被引:32
作者
Dardanoni, V [1 ]
Lambert, P
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ York, Dept Econ, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s003550000085
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we expound the idea that horizontal inequity (H1) in different tax systems be compared by transplanting the H1 from one tax system into the other, as a mapping between its pre- and post-tax living standard distributions, and then applying known results to compare the extent of association present in the two joint distributions. We make this idea operational by means of axioms which, we show, lead to an implementable procedure based on the 'copula'. Statistical inference procedures are discussed, and illustrative empirical exercises are undertaken for the UK, Canadian and Israeli tax and benefit systems.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 816
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1949, STUDY PUBLIC FINANCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, ANAL FREQUENCY DATA
[3]   REDISTRIBUTIVE EFFECT AND UNEQUAL INCOME-TAX TREATMENT [J].
ARONSON, JR ;
JOHNSON, P ;
LAMBERT, PJ .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 104 (423) :262-270
[4]   THE COMPARISON OF MULTI-DIMENSIONED DISTRIBUTIONS OF ECONOMIC-STATUS [J].
ATKINSON, AB ;
BOURGUIGNON, F .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1982, 49 (02) :183-201
[5]  
ATKINSON AB, 1980, EC TAXATION
[6]   ETHICAL SOCIAL INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF EFFECTIVE TAX BENEFIT PROGRESSIVITY [J].
BLACKORBY, C ;
DONALDSON, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1984, 17 (04) :683-694
[7]  
CUTLER DM, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P546
[8]   A unified approach to likelihood inference on stochastic orderings in a nonparametric context [J].
Dardanoni, V ;
Forcina, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 93 (443) :1112-1123
[9]   MEASURING SOCIAL-MOBILITY [J].
DARDANONI, V .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1993, 61 (02) :372-394
[10]   A normative and statistical approach to measuring classical horizontal inequity [J].
Duclos, JY ;
Lambert, PJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2000, 33 (01) :87-113