The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial

被引:24
作者
LeBlanc, Annie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ruud, Kari L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Branda, Megan E. [2 ,4 ]
Tiedje, Kristina [2 ,5 ]
Boehmer, Kasey R. [2 ,3 ,9 ]
Pencille, Laurie J. [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Van Houten, Holly [1 ,2 ]
Matthews, Marc
Shah, Nilay D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
May, Carl R. [8 ]
Yawn, Barbara P. [6 ,7 ]
Montori, Victor M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Dept Hlth Sci, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Ctr Sci Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Univ Lyon 2, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Lyon, France
[6] Olmsted Med Ctr, Dept Res, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Family & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[9] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Diabetes; Shared decision making; Cardiovascular prevention; Implementation; OPTION SCALE; MEDICATIONS; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-12-130
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Shared decision making contributes to high quality healthcare by promoting a patient-centered approach. Patient involvement in selecting the components of a diabetes medication program that best match the patient's values and preferences may also enhance medication adherence and improve outcomes. Decision aids are tools designed to involve patients in shared decision making, but their adoption in practice has been limited. In this study, we propose to obtain a preliminary estimate of the impact of patient decision aids vs. usual care on measures of patient involvement in decision making, diabetes care processes, medication adherence, glycemic and cardiovascular risk factor control, and resource utilization. In addition, we propose to identify, describe, and explain factors that promote or inhibit the routine embedding of decision aids in practice. Methods/Design: We will be conducting a mixed-methods study comprised of a cluster-randomized, practical, multicentered trial enrolling clinicians and their patients (n = 240) with type 2 diabetes from rural and suburban primary care practices (n = 8), with an embedded qualitative study to examine factors that influence the incorporation of decision aids into routine practice. The intervention will consist of the use of a decision aid (Statin Choice and Aspirin Choice, or Diabetes Medication Choice) during the clinical encounter. The qualitative study will include analysis of video recordings of clinical encounters and in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participating patients, clinicians, and clinic support staff, in both trial arms. Discussion: Upon completion of this trial, we will have new knowledge about the effectiveness of diabetes decision aids in these practices. We will also better understand the factors that promote or inhibit the successful implementation and normalization of medication choice decision aids in the care of chronic patients in primary care practices.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Clinician's use of the Statin Choice decision aid in patients with diabetes: a videographic study nested in a randomized trial [J].
Abadie, Roberto ;
Weymiller, Audrey J. ;
Tilburt, Jon ;
Shah, Nilay D. ;
Charles, Cathy ;
Gafni, Amiram ;
Montori, Victor M. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 15 (03) :492-497
[2]  
[Anonymous], BOOK NAT DIAB FACT S
[3]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING HLTH PERCE
[4]   Systematic review: Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes Mellitus [J].
Bolen, Shari ;
Feldman, Leonard ;
Vassy, Jason ;
Wilson, Lisa ;
Yeh, Hsin-Chieh ;
Marinopoulos, Spyriclon ;
Wiley, Crystal ;
Selvin, Elizabeth ;
Wilson, Renee ;
Bass, Eric B. ;
Brancati, Frederick L. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (06) :386-399
[5]   The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Breslin, Maggie ;
Mlillan, Rebecca J. ;
Montori, Victor M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 73 (03) :465-472
[6]  
Denzin N. K., 2018, The Sage handbook of qualitative research
[7]  
Donner A., 2010, Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research
[8]   The Potential Effects Of HEDIS Performance Measures On The Quality Of Care [J].
Eddy, David M. ;
Pawlson, L. Gregory ;
Schaaf, David ;
Peskin, Barbara ;
Shcheprov, Andrei ;
Dziuba, Julia ;
Bowman, Jill ;
Eng, Benjamin .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (05) :1429-1441
[9]   The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks [J].
Elwyn, G ;
Hutchings, H ;
Edwards, A ;
Rapport, F ;
Wensing, M ;
Cheung, WY ;
Grol, R .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (01) :34-42
[10]   Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement [J].
Elwyn, G ;
Edwards, A ;
Wensing, M ;
Hood, K ;
Atwell, C ;
Grol, R .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (02) :93-99