Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:101
作者
Dinh, Kathryn T. [1 ]
Mahal, Brandon A. [1 ]
Ziehr, David R. [1 ]
Muralidhar, Vinayak [1 ]
Chen, Yu-Wei [2 ]
Viswanathan, Vidya B. [3 ,4 ]
Nezolosky, Michelle D. [3 ,4 ]
Beard, Clair J. [5 ,6 ]
Choueiri, Toni K. [6 ,7 ]
Martin, Neil E. [5 ,6 ]
Orio, Peter F. [5 ,6 ]
Sweeney, Christopher J. [6 ,7 ]
Trinh, Quoc D. [8 ]
Nguyen, Paul L. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Urol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
neoplasm grading; neoplasm staging; prostatic neoplasms; SEER program; watchful waiting; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOMES; MEN; PSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined the incidence of pathological upgrading and up staging for contemporary, clinically low risk patients, and identified predictors of having occult, advanced disease to inform the selection of patients for active surveillance. Materials and Methods: We studied 10,273 patients in the SEER database diagnosed with clinically low risk disease (cT1c/T2a, prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, Gleason 3+3=6) in 2010 to 2011 and treated with prostatectomy. The primary outcome was the incidence of upgrading to pathological Gleason score 7-10 or up staging to pathological T3-T4/N1 disease. Multivariable logistic regression of cases with complete biopsy data (5,581) identified significant predictors of upgrading or up staging, which were then used to create a risk stratification table. Results: At prostatectomy 44% of cases were upgraded and 9.7% were up staged. Multivariable analysis of 5,581 patients showed age, prostate specific antigen and percent positive cores (all p <0.001) but not race were associated with occult, advanced disease. With these variables dichotomized at the median, age older than 60 years (AOR 1.39), prostate specific antigen greater than 5.0 ng/ml (AOR 1.28) and more than 25% positive cores (AOR 1.76) were significantly associated with upgrading (all p <0.001). Similarly, age older than 60 years (AOR 1.42), prostate specific antigen greater than 5.0 ng/ml (AOR 1.44) and more than 25% positive cores (AOR 2.26) were associated with up staging (all p <0.001). Overall 60% of 5,581 low risk cases with prostate specific antigen 7.5 to 9.9 ng/ml and more than 25% positive cores were upgraded. This study is limited by possible bias introduced by only using patients selected for prostatectomy. Conclusions: Nearly half of clinically low risk patients harbor Gleason 7 or greater, or pT3 or greater disease, and should be risk stratified by prostate specific antigen and percent positive cores for consideration of further testing before deciding on active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 349
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SEER STAT DAT INC SE
[2]   Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Ruutu, Mirja ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Stark, Jennifer R. ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Bratell, Stefan ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (18) :1708-1717
[3]   Optimization of Prostate Biopsy: the Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection, Localization and Risk Assessment [J].
Bjurlin, Marc A. ;
Meng, Xiaosong ;
Le Nobin, Julien ;
Wysock, James S. ;
Lepor, Herbert ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03) :648-658
[4]   Clinical Versus Pathologic Staging for Prostate Adenocarcinoma How Do They Correlate? [J].
Cooke, Ellen W. ;
Shrieve, Dennis C. ;
Tward, Jonathan D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 35 (04) :364-368
[5]   Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Progress and Promise [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Klotz, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (27) :3669-3676
[6]   Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: A systematic review [J].
Eichler, K ;
Hempel, S ;
Wilby, J ;
Myers, L ;
Bachmann, LM ;
Kleijnen, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05) :1605-1612
[7]   The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[8]   Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Pierorazio, Phillip M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) :1019-1024
[9]   A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy gleason score [J].
Fine, Samson W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) :1335-1338
[10]   Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: Risk factors and clinical implications [J].
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Presti, Joseph C., Jr. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (03) :495-499