Validity and reliability of simple questions in assessing short- and long-term outcome in Norwegian stroke patients

被引:8
作者
Berge, E [1 ]
Fjærtoft, H
Indredavik, B
Sandset, PM
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ulleval Hosp, Dept Haematol, Haematol Res Lab, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Trondheim Hosp, Dept Med, Stroke Unit, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
outcome stroke; recovery stroke; simple questions; validity and reliability; Barthel ADL index; Modified Rankin Scale; validity of simple questions; reliability of simple questions;
D O I
10.1159/000047658
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The utility of simple questions for the assessment of stroke outcome in large-scale international studies has generally been approved, but their validity and reliability have not been evaluated in different cultures or at different intervals after a stroke. The study comprised 150 stroke patients who had been admitted consecutively to a stroke unit 6 weeks or 6 months earlier. Two weeks before the visit the patient received a postal questionnaire containing the simple 'dependency' question: 'In the last 2 weeks, did you require help from another person for everyday activities?' and the simple 'recovery' question: 'Do you feel that you have made a complete recovery from your stroke?'. The visit was performed by trained personnel unaware of the patient's or his carer's replies, and comprised the same 2 questions administered by the personnel, the Barthel ADL Index (BI) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The patients' functional status was categorised as good or bad according to the chosen cutoff levels on BI and mRS. At 6 months the dependency question had an accuracy of 83 and 82% in identifying patients with good or bad outcome, defined as BI greater than or equal to 95 or < 95 and mRS <3 or greater than or equal to3, respectively, whereas the recovery question had an accuracy of 86% when compared with mRS = 0 or >0. There was no difference in accuracy of the simple questions at 6 weeks compared with 6 months, and there was no clinically important difference between responses from patients and carers. The agreement between the responses to the questionnaire and the interview was good to moderate (K = 0.62 for the dependency question, and 0.55 for the recovery question). We conclude that the simple questions seem To be valid and reliable measures of stroke outcome when tested in Norwegian patients after 6 weeks or 6 months, which supports their continued use in large-scale multinational stroke studies at different intervals after stroke. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 310
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]   Low molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a double-blind randomised study [J].
Berge, E ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Nakstad, PH ;
Sandset, PM .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9211) :1205-1210
[3]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[4]   CAST: Randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke [J].
Chen, ZM ;
Hui, JM ;
Liu, LS ;
Liu, ZM ;
Peto, R ;
Sandercock, P ;
Wang, WQ ;
Wang, YX ;
Wang, ZB ;
Xie, JX ;
You, GX ;
Zhang, FL ;
Zhang, HQ ;
Zhao, ZY .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9066) :1641-1649
[5]   Are simple questions a valid measure of outcome after stroke? [J].
Dennis, M ;
Wellwood, I ;
Warlow, C .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1997, 7 (01) :22-27
[6]   How reliable are simple questions in assessing outcome after stroke? [J].
Dennis, M ;
Wellwood, I ;
ORourke, S ;
MacHale, S ;
Warlow, C .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1997, 7 (01) :19-21
[7]  
Fletcher R, 1988, CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY
[8]   Evaluating neurological outcome measures: The bare essentials [J].
Hobart, JC ;
Lamping, DL ;
Thompson, AJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 60 (02) :127-130
[9]  
HOMMEL M, 1998, CEREBROVASC DIS, V8, P19
[10]   LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE [J].
KAY, R ;
WONG, KS ;
YU, YL ;
CHAN, YW ;
TSOI, TH ;
AHUJA, AT ;
CHAN, FL ;
FONG, KY ;
LAW, CB ;
WONG, A ;
WOO, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (24) :1588-1593